The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > News > Wire Sports

In search of substance

By Tim Lemke (Contact) | Wednesday, January 7, 2009

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Major League Baseball's drug policy seems simple. If a player tests positive for a performance-enhancing substance, he's suspended. That's it.

But the cases of Phillies pitcher J.C. Romero and the Yankees' Sergio Mitre show things aren't always so cut and dry.

Romero, who won two games in the 2008 World Series, and Mitre will start next season with 50-game suspensions after testing positive for banned substances.

The Philadelphia Inquirer and ESPN.com spoke to Romero, who said he did nothing wrong when he purchased an over-the-counter supplement from a food nutrition store last year.

Romero wasn't found guilty of knowingly taking a banned substance, but an arbitrator ruled he was "negligent" in not knowing what was in the supplement, known as 6-OXO Extreme. Mitre has told a similar story of buying a supplement at GNC store in Florida. However, both have accepted their punishments and won't appeal.

"These players should not be suspended," said Michael Weiner, the general counsel for the Major League Baseball Players Association. "Their unknowing actions are plainly distinguishable from those of a person who intentionally used a performance-enhancing substance."

Romero claims to have shown the supplements to the Phillies' strength coach and his personal nutritionist before taking them and that the union - at that time - approved the use of all over-the-counter supplements. (The union later revealed that three over-the-counter supplements contained a banned substance, but it was too late for Romero and Mitre.)

On the surface, it's clear Romero's case is nothing like the stories of personal trainers injecting players with drugs or athletes cycling through steroids while hanging out at shady gyms. Barry Bonds reportedly received supplements from a laboratory the government eventually shut down. Romero got his from the same store where elderly women buy their fish oil pills.

What's clear here is that while MLB may have a solid handle on the testing side of the drug equation, there's still a "Wild West" situation when it comes to what players put in their bodies. It seems likely that there will be increased reports of players ingesting supplements without full knowledge of their contents or origins. There are two things, however, that might prevent future cases of players unwittingly cheating.

First, the procedure for determining whether a supplement is allowed must be crystal clear. There should be a single, authoritative source of information available to players, and athletes should be required to consult that source if there are questions about a supplement. A Web site, updated in real time, would do the trick.

Second, baseball could continue to allow players to buy whatever over-the-counter supplements they want from a select group of vendors, as long as all orders are processed through a system monitored by the league. Stores like GNC and Vitamin Shoppe could agree to such a system in exchange for the ability to promote themselves as official partners with the league, and they would therefore be encouraged to sell only products that are compliant with baseball's drug policy. The league only would allow players to buy products once they have passed a test for banned substances.

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  • Getty Images
Phillies left hander J.C. Romero received a 50-game suspension for testing positive for a banned substance.

Click the photo to enlarge.

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Israel declines to ask U.S. to OK Iran attack

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  3. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  4. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  5. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor plays the race card
  6. Israeli know-how
  7. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  8. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips
  9. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  10. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

    Market Data

    Advertising Links
    TWT Store
    • e-edition
    • Print Edition
    • Weekly Washington Times
    TWT Affiliates
    • Middle East Times
    • Golf
    • UPI
    • Arbor Ballroom
    • Washington Times Global
    • About TWT
    • Press Room
    • F.A.Q.
    • Work for TWT
    • Advertise
    • Sponsors
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Site Map

    All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.