- Air Force cadets ‘revolt’ after officials remove biblical verse from whiteboard
- Rep. Lee: Paul Ryan out of touch with urban Americans
- House votes down resolution to force Issa to apologize
- Kremlin blocks opposition websites; Kasparov fears Putin plans ‘something drastic’
- Saving trees? EPA wastes $1.5 million storing unneeded pamphlets in warehouse
- Scott Brown Senate bid in New Hampshire may launch soon
- Jeffrey Corzine, son of ex-N.J. governor, dead at 31
- Australian surfing magazine sorry for calling indigenous surfer ‘apeish’
- Records: Man in Fla. theater shooting also was texting
- The Putin problem: U.S. needs Russian rockets for spy satellites
Blagojevich faces impeachment trial
Members of the Illinois House of Representatives voted Friday to impeach Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich, setting up a Senate trial to determine whether the first Democrat to be elected governor of Illinois in 30 years should be removed from office for an abuse of power.
In an overwhelming 114-1 vote, the House accused the second-term Democrat of allowing his ego and ambition to drive his decisions, saying he betrayed his oath of office and was not fit to lead the state.
“We stand here today because of the perfidy of one man: Rod Blagojevich,” said Rep. Barbara Flynn Currie, a Democrat who chaired a special impeachment committee. “To overturn the results of an election is not something that should be undertaken lightly.”
Another Democrat, Rep. Jack D. Franks, said it was the “duty” of state legislators “to clean up the mess and stop the freak show that’s become Illinois government.”
Mr. Franks, who also served on the impeachment committee, said that while the atmosphere in the state capitol was one of sadness as a result of the vote, “it’s a new day. It’s a dawn.”
At a news conference following the vote, Mr. Blagojevich — accused of trying to sell the Senate seat vacated by President-elect Barack Obama — said the impeachment vote was “of course not a surprise. It was a foregone conclusion.
“From the very moment of my re-election, I’ve been engaged in a struggle with the House to try to get things done for people,” he said, describing the vote as an offshoot of disagreements he had with the House over issues ranging from public-works programs and expanded access to health care to property tax relief.
The furor over that Senate seat continued to roil Friday. The Illinois Supreme Court ruled that Mr. Blagojevich’s appointment to the seat, former state Attorney General Roland Burris, could be seated even though the secretary of state refused to sign the paperwork.
But Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat, said at a news conference that the U.S. Senate will still require a signature.
“There has never in the history of the Senate been a waiver of the requirement that the secretary of state’s signature be part of the appointment process — never,” Mr. Durbin said.
However, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was more circumspect, releasing a statement after Mr. Durbin’s words had been reported saying merely that Democratic leaders were taking legal advice on the matter.
“The Senate parliamentarian, the secretary of the Senate and Senate legal counsel are advising Senate leadership as we consider a way forward,” spokesman Jim Manley said.
The Senate Democratic Caucus warned Mr. Blagojevich a month ago that “under no circumstance” would it seat any Blagojevich appointee. But it had backed off that hard-line stance earlier this week saying Mr. Burris could be seated under some conditions, until Mr. Durbin’s Friday remarks appeared to retrench Senate Democrats into their earlier position.
At an impromptu news conference, Mr. Blagojevich surrounded himself with some of the people he claimed to have helped as governor, including a man in a wheelchair and a transplant recipient. He took no questions.
Mr. Blagojevich has denied any wrongdoing, and his attorney, Ed Genson, said Thursday’s committee vote to recommend impeachment that the outcome “was predetermined from the start.” Mr. Genson said he was hopeful his client would “receive a fair trial in the Senate.”
About the Author
Jerry Seper is the investigative editor for The Washington Times.
- With bombs away, drug traffickers and illegal immigrants make their play
- Medical-device company exec admits to bilking shareholders of $400M
- Justice Dept: Florida's disabled children unnecessarily put in nursing facilities
- Man gets 11 years in Philadelphia mob crackdown
- Eric Holder asks for respect from protesters of George Zimmerman verdict
Latest Blog Entries
By Bob Dole
The industrious island has proved itself worthy of U.S. inclusion
- F-35 secrets now showing up in Chinas stealth fighter
- USS Kidd sent to Indian Ocean after 'indication' of Malaysian jet crash
- FBI blocked in corruption probe involving Sens. Reid, Lee
- Warren Buffett's son to spend $23.7 million in effort to save South African rhinos
- College group's diversity event canceled after excluding white people
- Justice Department refuses info on hundreds of prosecutor misconduct cases
- MILLER: Law enforcement realizes good people with guns deter crime
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
Chaos as Manhattan building explodes
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again