The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    Pence mum on health-bill court challenge

  • World

    Guilty plea may not hurt BAE's U.S. arm

  • National

    Dodd introduces financial reform legislation

  • Politics

    Obama hones final health care pitch

  • Security

    E-mails suggested Fort Hood suspect subpar for Army

  • Business

    Google likely to shut down China engine

  • Politics

    Temporary foreign workers threaten immigration deal

Home » Blogs

Monday, January 12, 2009

Massive lands bill clears filibuster

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

2 million acres set aside on vote of 66-12

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
Subscribe to this story's comments

Shanghaied

Business as usual. Let's just keep voting them in.
Mark as offensive

Citizen1

Poor article. No details on why or who the republicans were who decided with the libs on this issue. Why was there no or very little debate on the floor? Primarily considering the republicans decided with the majority w/o the full debate. I am suspicious of the these republicans who side [behind closed doors] with the libs. Too often the libs hide behind closed doors to construct [and finalize] a bill. The libs are practicing a MONARCHY here and I am standing against this attitude of their self indulgent power grab. MORE LIBS = MORE SOCIALISM!
Mark as offensive

dittoman

No details on where the 2 million acres is or what comprises it. How much land is government owned vs private owned? Each bit of land that goes into public ownership goes off tax role. How much will it cost? These are just minor details? If we can buy these lands, then we can afford to compensate landowners when we take interest in their land for "public use" as the fifth amendment proscribes. You have to define "use" to be "ownership" to not compensate. Kinda like "is".
Mark as offensive

mrunpc

Don't you remember when the Supreme Court issued that ruling not long ago about eminent domain? Well, just combine this Big Gov't land grab with that and you get an idea of what the Communists who now run Congress have in mind. Welcome to The Communist States of America. Thank you lobotomized Obama rump swab voters. Learn about the illegal Kenyan Muslim mulatto con man who would be "president"...unbelievable! www.obamaforgery.com www.obamacrimes.com www.wnd.com
Mark as offensive

lcmser

See below link for list of how each Senator voted: http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00001 According to the C-SPAN coverage this weekend, there are 45 earmarks in this package. It's a shame that only 12 Senators are willing to stand up to the Washington "old-boy" spending fraternity. And, this vote comes less than 1 week after Sens. Feingold and McCaskill stood up with Sens. Coburn and McCain in announcing legislation to fight earmarks.
Mark as offensive

Onething

Senate will only fight earmarks and bills Republicans sponsor. All others are welcome. Hooray for socialism. Insert hammer and sickle symbol here.
Mark as offensive

skooter

Money should be spent on SAVING the forest. PINE BEETLES are killing the trees. Dead trees = Forest Fires; Forest fires = erosion & no snowpack; no snowpack = no water. Designated wilderness areas mean reduced access to fight the forest fires. So, in combating the forest's greatest enemy...the beetle we NEED ACCESS vote NO to WILDERNESS!!!!!!!! Save a Forest maintain access.
Mark as offensive

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. WOLF: Obama family health care fracas
  2. Justice, CIA clash over probe of interrogator IDs
  3. Social Security IOUs stashed away
  4. KUHNER: A gangster regime
  5. China's yuan value hits U.S. economy, two experts say
More Top Stories »
  1. WOLF: Questions for your representative
  2. PRUDEN: The suicide mission for the Democrats
  3. EDITORIAL: Obama's sick obsession
  4. EDITORIAL: Obama nominee's sympathy for sexual sadists
  5. E-mails suggested Fort Hood suspect subpar for Army

Most Commented

  1. GOP to use amendments as tactic
  2. EDITORIAL: Obama's sick obsession
  3. Obama hones final health care pitch
  4. Justice, CIA clash over probe of interrogator IDs
  5. E-mails suggested Fort Hood suspect subpar for Army
More Top Stories »
  1. GOP move on pork pressures Obama
  2. Obama humanizes health debate in final push
  3. Utah lawmaker resigns in hot-tub incident
  4. Pelosi confident House will pass health care
  5. LAMBRO: Roberts for the defense

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Off the beaten path online: House Republicans rally tea partiers on the Capitol...

  • Belief Blog

    Sayonara to the president's faith-based council

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.