Clinton hearing turns into love fest

Who would dare question someone as smart as Hillary Clinton, who announces she will bring "Smart Power" to the position?

Hope, Change and Big Lies are all around us. Remember this? “The great masses of the people will more easily fall victims to a big lie than to a small one.” A. Hitler

Why go to the hearing? It was going to be a lovefest anyway. Hillary will hang herself, and pretty quick. Bill, her corrupt "husband" will help. Get ready for the boo-boos and scandal. If Hillary had been a Republican whose husband had extorted $450 million from foreign countries, she would have caught h*ll from the panel. Because she is a moral-less Democrat, the panel didn't care.

Why should the Republicans even bother to come? It's a global, Humanist-indoctrinated (http://www.jcn.com/manifestos.html) prayer meeting where Saint Hillary reminds all the other members of the choir of their 'shared humanity' with the 'world community' at least 3 or 4 times. Infidels and hangers-on to the old Christian ethic of the Founders need not apply or be present to be trampled underfoot.

Why provide the semblance of respectability to gangsters like the Clintons? Do you imagine for a moment a truthful answer is in the cards?

God, is everybody in DC corrupt? Why can't people openly discuss the stench of the Clinton's private library contributions, $500 million dollars worth, and the strings that these helped pull? It's breathtaking how these people openly sell their influence and our government sovereignty hangs in the balance...what little of it that's left anyway.

I hope their life insurance is up-to-date.

I am so sick and tired of the spineless Republicans!! Not showing up for this hearing is unbelievable. I want names!!!!

What would be the use? Bring up something negative and the liberal media says it is sour grapes get over it. Why sit on a target?

The salient question is why did no Democrat ask a difficult question of Hillary? Certainly there are dozens, if not hundreds of pertinent questions all Americans would like to have answered. The Democratic Party has been given virtual free reign over the American government for at least two years. It would be nice if they made some pretense at being responsible to it and for it. Do they think we are fools?

FOOLISH PEOPLE ARE BLIND TO FOOLISHNESS! These people are praying upon their followers political blindness. They are commandeering the political and information structures of this country using sound bytes. They have convinced their followers that they can be their gods and can provide them, their every need!!

What is astounding that no one has asked of Hillary is: Whitewater, travelgate, chinagate, lost Rose Law firm files for 2 years, has 15 former business associates who are felons. Why hasn't anyone brought up the fact she was fired from being legal counsel to President Nixon in 1974 and tried to go around the Constitution. Her boss fired her for being a liar and being unethical! He couldn't even recommend her! This is a travesty that she will see our national security secrets!

When is someone going to set a date to begin a national campaign for true Americans to ride on buses into Washington, DC? Million man march? Nay, a 10 million persons march to stand on the steps of Congress and demand resignations of every single Senator and Congressperson.

Why bother sitting in on a confirmation that is already guaranteed? Are we going to find out that Mrs. Clinton is any more corrupt than she has been in the past? She has already showed that she has sever conflicts of interest with several countries, yet she will be allowed to become the SOS and make deals, treaties and negotiate with them. Both the Clintons are corrupt, yet they get away with murder (Vince Foster anyone?) I wonder why that is?

"Powerful Republicans, perhaps still miffed about the drubbing they took in the November election, were expected to attack the nominee for secretary of state" "Still miffed", eh?? I take great offense at that characterizaton -- it would never be used if DEMOCRATS were the offended parties (a la 2000 and 2004) But Republicans are "still miffed"; whereas Democrats were (and still ARE) no doubt "reasonably angry" over the results in those election years, right? But of course, there's NO liberal bias in the media, either.....POPPYCOCK!! I guess that is what people are if they question the divinity of the false "messiah", or if they object to what would be considered as criminal behavior on the part of ANYONE ELSE being overlooked by equally crooked Democrats in the House and Senate! And also, any hint of disapproval over the record of, shall we say "less than rose-smelling" incidents in the past of the "nominee for secretary of state" and her odious husband is viewed as "attacking" the "nominee" -- but, oh, by the way, Judge Thomas, just "WHAT was that on the top of your Coke can?" Doesn't anyone have the decency to recall the horrendous way that Clarence Thomas was treated by being subjected to the press' drumbeat of Anita Hill's STILL unproven slanders in the hearings on HIS confirmation?! Nope -- she's a Democrat, and Democrats "never" lie, at least not if you believe their media defenders...and her slanders are STILL being repeated!! Yes, some people out here are "still miffed", and I suspect that our numbers will continue to grow as the obama circus becomes more and more ridiculous in the selection of players in what is rapidly becoming nothing less than a national embarrassment! The collection of corrupt and/or incompetent Clintonian "retreads" that are being touted as "change" are hardly that, and certainly NOT "change [anyone] can believe in" -- since WHEN are any of these "nominations" a "change" from anything done by a previous administration?? Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Maxine Waters, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, et al, would all be in JAIL if they were "little people" like the rest of us -- you know, those folks who don't get a Federal job without supplying all sorts of documentation about who THEY are, and yet we are now supposed to accept a person who WON'T even supply a birth certificate as "president" -- and that's WON'T, not CAN'T, people, because I fully believe that he CAN, but if he does, then it will prove him INELIGIBLE to be president, and I don't believe that he will do anything to reassure the American people about his true identity. I honestly feel that this man is so hungry for the power of this office that he would do ANYTHING to keep it.......we are in VERY dangerous waters here!!