- The Washington Times - Wednesday, July 8, 2009

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Oliver North argues that Honduras was right to remove its president, who violated his country’s constitution (“Wrong-turn Obama,” Opinion, Sunday). Contrary to President Obama’s claims, Honduras acted legally. Honduran law dictated its president’s removal after he used coercion and money from a foreign dictator to push an illegal referendum to extend his rule. Article 239 of the Honduran constitution bans presidents from holding office if they even propose a repeal of term limits. Article 272 lets the military enforce constitutional term limits.

The military removed the president on orders from the country’s Supreme Court. Of the 128 members of the Honduran Congress 123 voted to replace him with a civilian, the Congress’ speaker.

Using troops to enforce court orders is not unprecedented — it happens in the United States, too. Federal troops enforced a court order desegregating Little Rock’s public schools in 1957, when Arkansas’ racist governor defied it.

HANS BADER

Counsel

Competitive Enterprise Institute

Washington

Copyright © 2016 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide