

Associated Press
Democrats have urged CIA Director Leon Panetta to “correct” his public statements that the CIA always briefed Congress truthfully, which they say contradict private remarks.The politically explosive clash between the CIA and congressional Democrats flared anew Thursday as CIA chief Leon Panetta rejected fresh charges that the spy agency had systematically lied to lawmakers about key administration policies in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks.
Seven Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee in a letter made public Wednesday evening said that Mr. Panetta recently conceded privately that CIA briefers misled lawmakers and demanded he “correct” earlier statements denying information had been concealed from Congress.
The letter built on previous allegations from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that CIA officials had lied to her in 2002 about harsh interrogation methods being used under the George W. Bush administration, allegations Mr. Panetta also forcefully denied.
“Director Panetta stands by his May 15 statement,” CIA spokesman George Little said. “This agency and this director believe it is vital to keep the Congress fully and currently informed. Director Panetta’s actions back that up.”
An intelligence official who spoke on the condition of anonymity said the letter mischaracterized Mr. Panetta’s testimony to the committee in a closed-door June 24 session.
“Panetta didn’t say that the agency misled Congress,” the official said. “He took decisive steps to inform the oversight committees of something that hadn’t been appropriately briefed in the past. He didn’t attribute motives to that. He wasn’t director at the time.”
Another intelligence official familiar with the matter in dispute said the Democrats’ complaints focused on a CIA program that was developed in response to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks that had not been disclosed to Congress until the June briefing by Mr. Panetta.
“When this program came to Panetta’s attention, it was with the recommendation that it be briefed to the Congress. He agreed and got the job done in about a day, as soon as the members of the oversight committees could be brought together,” the official said. “He has also asked a senior officer to take a look at what happened and to explore what the CIA can do to improve its reporting to the Congress.”
Some Democrats said Mrs. Pelosi had been vindicated by the letter from the House Democrats, but Republicans Thursday stepped up their demands that Mrs. Pelosi and her colleagues back up the charges against the CIA or apologize.
Michigan Rep. Peter Hoekstra, ranking Republican on the House intelligence panel, said on The Washington Times’ “America’s Morning News” radio show that the entire dispute is “very, very bizarre.”
“The Democrats are just throwing this term ‘lied’ around very, very loosely. And, at the same time, they’re saying, ‘You Republicans, don’t politicize this,’ ” Mr. Hoekstra said. “It’s kind of like we are doing nothing, you’re the ones who are sliding letters under my door after hours in the middle of the night and sending them to the press before I ever get them.”
In their letter dated June 26, the seven Democrats - Anna G. Eshoo of California, John F. Tierney of Massachusetts, Rush D. Holt of New Jersey, Mike Thompson of California, Alcee L. Hastings of Florida, Janice D. Schakowsky of Illinois and Adam Smith of Washington - asserted the Mr. Panetta said in the June 24 briefing that CIA officials had essentially lied in congressional briefings over a period of seven years.
“Recently you testified that you have determined that top CIA officials have concealed significant actions from all members of Congress, and misled members for a number of years from 2001 to this week,” they wrote. “This is similar to other deceptions of which we are aware from other recent periods.”
Their claims were seconded late Wednesday by House Intelligence Chairman Silvestre Reyes, Texas Democrat.
In a letter to Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. Reyes wrote that the intelligence panel “has been misled, has not been provided full and complete notifications, and (in at least one case) was affirmatively lied to.”
View Entire Story
Kara Rowland, White House reporter for The Washington Times, is a D.C.-area native. She graduated from the University of Virginia, where she studied American government and spent nearly all her waking hours working as managing editor of the Cavalier Daily, UVa.’s student newspaper.
Her interest in political reporting was piqued by an internship at Roll Call the summer before her ...
By Richard W. Rahn
Budget fantasy won't help us cope with coming fiscal disaster

By Ben Wolfgang - The Washington Times
If some Arizona lawmakers get their way, George Carlin’s “Seven Words” routine could be updated ...

By Ravi Nessman - Associated Press
Indian investigators were searching Tuesday for the motorcycle assailant who attached a bomb to an ...

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times
The FDA has won its two-year fight to shut down an Amish farmer who was ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

How does our 50th state view D.C. politics?

Communities writers, and sometimes readers, debte the political, economic and social issues of the day.