BREITBART: No more apologies from Sotomayor

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

With Barack Obama, many Americans had hoped to get a post-racial president. With Mr. Obama’s pick of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to replace David H. Souter on the Supreme Court, it looks less and less like they got one.

President Obama - a man we still hardly know - clearly subscribes to the notion that we should judge each other not just on the content of our character, but also by the color of our skin.

We’ve had warning signs before. Remember the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr.?

As for the outrage du jour, the call for Sotomayor to apologize for making a racist comment in a 2001 speech is silly. She said what she meant, and she meant what she said: “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”

No white nominee could get away with that statement’s corollary in which a wise white man comes to better conclusions that a Latina. Nor should he.

A non-apology apology - which seems to be all the price she is going to pay - is pointless.

The White House simply says Judge Sotomayor used “poor” word choice. But that excuse applies to any number of public figures who have had their careers derailed for similar language blunders. This double standard needs to go on public trial.

In today’s left-of-center culture, the “white male” - “the victim,” as it were - understands that what Judge Sotomayor said is the accepted liberal way of thinking. Identity politics (also known as political correctness, multiculturalism and cultural Marxism) is the foundation of the political left. It is the first, middle and last lesson taught today in Academia. It is the mainstream media’s rulebook.

It is why Sotomayor and Obama are praiseworthy, and why Clarence Thomas, Condoleezza Rice, Alberto Gonzalez and Miguel Estrada are unacceptable members of their respective tribes. It is the onerous double standard that ensures that the left wins every argument over race. And that is far too useful a weapon for the president and his Democratic Party to give up.

And apparently the Republican Party doesn’t want to wrest that weapon away any time soon. When Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich called Judge Sotomayor out, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael S. Steele, a man who has been bludgeoned by the left for the sin of being a black Republican, warned against “slammin’ and rammin’ ” the nominee.

The man who oversees the senatorial fate of Republicans, Sen. John Cornyn, also accepts Mr. Steele’s appease-the-left strategy.

“This is not the kind of tone that any of us wants to set when it comes to performing our constitutional responsibilities of advise and consent,” Mr. Cornyn told National Public Radio. I’m sure NPR’s notoriously liberal audience is swaying right over to the new and defanged GOP.

Judge Sotomayor made the offending comment - yet now she is the victim. It’s amazing how effective political correctness can be.

The media’s role in killing the racism meme was done through sleight of hand. Instead of calling the comment “controversial on its face,” the media minimized the offense by asserting that it came from a politically motivated camp. As in: “Republicans Upset over Nominee’s Past Comments.” That made the controversy a noncontroversy, something that dreaded Republicans merely tried to gin up.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
About the Author
Donald Lambro

Donald Lambro

Donald Lambro is the chief political correspondent for The Washington Times, the author of five books and a nationally syndicated columnist. His twice-weekly United Feature Syndicate column appears in newspapers across the country, including The Washington Times. He received the Warren Brookes Award For Excellence In Journalism in 1995 and in that same year was the host and co-writer of ...

Latest Stories

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks