You are currently viewing the printable version of this article, to return to the normal page, please click here.

THE BONDHOLDERS: Joan Pryor

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

Joan Pryor
Family: Husband
Date of purchase: N/A
Percent of portfolio that were GM bonds at purchase: "A significant portion."
Percent of portfolio now: N/A
Reason for purchase: Safe investment for a retirement income
Reason for holding after downgraded to junk status in 2005: Was told to wait it out
Original investment goal: Retirement income

Six years ago, Joan Pryor and her husband bought GM bonds for their retirement. Neither had a pension, and they felt they needed more retirement income than Social Security could provide.

"I'm worried, very worried. I have to figure out how to earn more income," Mrs. Pryor said. "We've had to cut back on charitable donations, which is hard, and we don't want to."

Mrs. Pryor said she has had to shop for cheaper phone and cable TV arrangements.

"We're not concerned with building a nest egg anymore," she said. "We're trying to use the nest egg to live on," and that amount has been shrinking because of GM's problems.

Mrs. Pryor said she thought bondholders held a privileged place among debtors during a bankruptcy. "A lot of people told us to hang on to the bonds," she said.

She said the terms of this bankruptcy do not make her feel privileged at all, and she is no Wall Street titan.

"Being portrayed as greedy is so off base it just doesn't make any sense," Mrs. Pryor said. "It isn't greedy to ask for equal treatment."

Click here to view vignettes of seven other GM bondholders.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks