



Sen. Charles Grassley (Barbara L. Salisbury/The Washington Times)A Republican senator seeking a bipartisan health care deal spoke Sunday of lowering expectations while one of President Obama’s Democratic allies questioned whether the White House had the votes necessary for a such a costly and comprehensive plan during a recession.
Mr. Obama’s proposal to provide health care coverage for some 50 million Americans who lack it has become a contentious point for a Democratic-controlled House and Senate struggling to reach a consensus Mr. Obama desperately wants.
Much of the concern came after the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that the plan would cost $1 trillion over 10 years but cover only about one-third of those now lacking health insurance.
Democrats protested that the estimate overlooked important money-savers to be added later, but Republicans seized on the costly projection and the bill’s half-finished nature, throwing Democratic leaders on the defensive.
The United States is the only developed nation that does not have a comprehensive national health care plan for all its citizens.
Sen. Charles E. Grassley, Iowa Republican who is on the Finance Committee, said officials would have to rethink their best-case scenario for providing a sweeping overhaul of the health care system at a relatively low price.
“So we’re in the position of dialing down some of our expectations to get the costs down so that it’s affordable and, most importantly, so that it’s paid for because we can’t go to the point where we are now of not paying for something when we have trillions of dollars of debt,” he said.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat, said she wasn’t certain there are enough votes in the president’s own party to support the proposal.
“I think there’s a lot of concern in the Democratic caucus,” she said.
The overhaul’s chief proponent in the Senate, Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, Connecticut Democrat, urged patience as lawmakers continued working on the bill. However, Sens. John McCain, Arizona Republican, and Lindsey Graham, South Carolina Republican, said the bill’s cost was problematic.
“You do the math,” Mr. McCain said. “It comes up to $3 trillion. And so far, we have no proposal for having to pay for it.”
The CBO estimates “were a death blow to a government-run health care plan,” Mr. Graham said. “The Finance Committee has abandoned that. We do need to deal with inflation in health care, private and public inflation, but we’re not going to go down to the government-owning-health-care road in America, and I think that’s the story of this week. There’s been a bipartisan rejection of that.”
Competing plans abound in Congress, complicating Mr. Obama’s task.
“As a matter of fact, I don’t have the slightest idea what is in either of the two bills in the committees,” said Sen. Richard Lugar, Indiana Republican. “None of us do because much of it hasn’t been written, still being drafted… . What I would suggest is we hang on now for a period of study so that we find literally what the alternatives are.”
As for his favored outcome, “I think it should be incremental steps,” Mr. Lugar said.
View Entire StoryBy Peter Vincent Pry
Hardening infrastructure will be key to minimizing the threat

By David Hood - The Washington Times
Reston-based LightSquared Inc. vowed Wednesday to continue its fight to establish a national wireless broadband ...

By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times
The Department of Education has dispatched “mystery shoppers” posing as prospective students to various colleges ...

By Meredith Somers - The Washington Times
George W. Huguely V lied to friends about his whereabouts the night Yeardley Love was ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

How does our 50th state view D.C. politics?

Reflections on raising families in a holistic way -- with a focus on nutrition and alternative health.

Everyone has the divine rights as human beings because they were created in the image of God