Climate bill targets hot tubs and light bulbs

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

The Democrat-led House pressed Thursday for enough votes to pass landmark legislation that would combat global warming by forcing U.S. companies to reduce their carbon-dioxide emissions, expanding expensive renewable-energy sources and trimming consumers’ choices on new light bulbs and hot tubs.

Publicly, President Obama urged passage of the legislation — one of his top priorities — even though it faces near-unanimous opposition from Republicans. Behind the scenes, his top aides and environmental allies lobbied wavering Democrats to vote yes as early as Friday. The chamber is trying to wrap up work this week before it breaks for the Fourth of July holiday.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, signaled her confidence that the bill would be approved by canceling a visit to Washington by former Vice President Al Gore, a major proponent of cutting so-called greenhouse-gas emissions.

The bill, if passed as expected, would go on to an uncertain future in the Senate. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, has asked committee chairmen to have a climate-change bill ready for Senate consideration in September.

But resistance there remained high among both Democrats and Republicans to key components of the bill, including its complicated pollution-permit market system called cap-and-trade. In addition, Senate Democrats are divided over regional disparities in the impact of the bill.

Democratic Sen. Richard J. Durbin of Illinois, the Senate’s majority whip, said Thursday that if legislation passes in the House, support for it will grow in the Senate.

“We’re kind of catching the wind that they create when it comes to cap-and-trade,” he said.

The House bill would cut U.S. greenhouse-gas emissions — primarily carbon dioxide — 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and 83 percent by 2050. It would also establish a new Renewable Electricity Standard (RES), which would force utilities to supply a minimum amount of their electricity from renewable energy sources.

The bill would reach carbon-dioxide emission targets by establishing a cap-and-trade system, which would require heavy emitters of carbon dioxide, and the oil and gas industry, to buy annual emissions permits from the government or through a secondary market.

The plan, as written by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, would auction a small percentage of the available permits, or allowances, directly to companies. The rest, more than 85 percent, would be given away to selected industries, local utility companies, states and Indian tribes.

Democrats contended the legislation would help reduce U.S. reliance on foreign oil, increase the use of renewable energy such as solar and wind power and increase employment in clean energy industries.

“This is a jobs bill,” Mr. Obama said Thursday, in his second public endorsement of the bill this week.

Republicans, dismissing official congressional estimates that showed an average cost to American families of $175 a year, argued that the measure would significantly increase energy costs on individuals and companies. They said the bill is really a thinly disguised energy tax that would impose excessive government intervention and reduce economic growth.

House Republican Leader John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, said the bill will cost the economy up to 2.7 million jobs.

“When it comes to energy, Washington Democrats, I think, are poised to make matters worse by imposing a job-killing energy tax, courtesy of Speaker Pelosi. This is going to force small businesses and their workers and families to pay more for electricity, gasoline, and other products that are made in America that have a high energy content,” he said.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks