The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • World
  • National
  • Politics
  • National Security
  • DC Area
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Technology
  • Investigations
  • Faith
  • Energy
  • Environment
  • Headlines
  • Citizen Journalism
  • National

    PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine

  • National

    U.S. links 8 to Somali terrorist group

  • Business

    Home sales surge 10.1 percent in October

  • Local

    Fenty trails Gray in D.C. poll

  • Politics

    S.C. governor faces 37 ethics violations

  • National

    China holds lawyer who tried to see Obama

  • World

    Israel-Hamas prisoner swap talks advance

Home » News » Politics

Saturday, June 27, 2009

Obama eyeing new order on Gitmo detainees

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos
Please stand by, images loading!
  • KATIE FALKENBERG/THE WASHINGTON TIMES
RESOLUTE: President Obama defends his decision to close Guantanamo prison and hold some terrorist suspects indefinitely, during a speech at the National Archives.

More Politics Stories

  • WH: Obama Afghan decision 'within days'
  • Tea Party react: Conservatives seek litmus test for RNC funding
  • Kennedy political dynasty in question
  • Gambling groups biggest betters on politics

By Lara Jakes and Pamela Hess ASSOCIATED PRESS

Stymied by Congress so far, the White House is considering issuing an executive order to indefinitely imprison a small number of Guantanamo Bay detainees considered too dangerous to prosecute or release, two administration officials said Friday.

One of the officials told the Associated Press that the order, if issued, would not take effect until after the Oct. 1 start of the upcoming 2010 fiscal year. Already, Congress has blocked the administration from spending any money this year to imprison the detainees in the United States.

But an administration official told The Washington Times Friday there is no order yet and a Justice Department task force evaluating how to handle detainees being held at a U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, is still working toward a July deadline.

"There is no executive order and the task force has not completed its work nor made its recommendations," the official said, asking for anonymity to speak about the status of interagency deliberations.

The administration also is considering asking Congress to pass new laws that would allow the indefinite detentions, the official said.

Both of the officials spoke Friday on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the still-tentative issue publicly. The possibility of an executive order was first reported by ProPublica and The Washington Post.

"A number of options are being considered," said one of the officials.

Asked if the detainees would be indefinitely held overseas or in the United States, the official said: "There's not really a lot of options overseas."

Christopher Anders, senior legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union Washington office, said the organization strongly opposes any plans for indefinite detention of prisoners.

"We're saying it shouldn't be done at all," he said Friday.

The Senate Armed Services Committee just completed work on its fiscal 2010 defense authorization bill. It was silent on the matter of indefinite detentions, according to a Senate aide familiar with the bill.

Without legislative backing, an executive order is the only route Mr. Obama has to get the needed authority.

The order also would only apply to current detainees at Guantanamo - and not ones caught and held in future counterinsurgent battles.

There are 229 detainees currently being held at Guantanamo. Several have been transferred to United States for prosecution, while others have been sent to foreign nations. The Obama administration is trying to relocate as many as 100 Yemeni detainees to Saudi Arabia for rehabilitation.

Mr. Obama said last month he was looking at continued imprisonment for a small number of Guantanamo detainees whom he described as too dangerous to release. He called it "the toughest issue we will face."

"I am not going to release individuals who endanger the American people," Mr. Obama said during a May 21 speech at the National Archives. "Al Qaeda terrorists and their affiliates are at war with the United States, and those that we capture - like other prisoners of war - must be prevented from attacking us again."

It's not clear how many detainees could fall into that category. Defense and Justice Department officials have privately said at least some could be freed at trial because prosecutors would be reluctant to expose classified evidence against the detainees.

A Pentagon task force is currently reviewing every case to see which are eligible for transfer or release, which could face trial in civilian U.S. courts, which are best suited to some version of a military commission, and which fall into the category to which Mr. Obama was referring: too dangerous to free, but against whom legal cases would be difficult to mount because of the manner in which evidence was gathered - coercion by cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.

Times staff writer Stephen Dinan contributed to this report.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Top Republican lawmakers not invited to State Dinner
  2. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  3. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  4. EDITORIAL EXCLUSIVE: On terrorists, Justice recused
  5. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
More Top Stories »
  1. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  2. Massive bill steals show in health care debate
  3. Report: D.C. schools chief Rhee mishandled sexual misconduct scandal
  4. Company that repaired Chairman Gray's house lacked license
  5. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Ego of 'O': It's all about him
  3. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  4. EDITORIAL: Schumer's change of heart
  5. Top Republican lawmakers not invited to State Dinner
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Death for being a Christian
  2. Unemployment taxes hit small firms hard
  3. The United Socialist States of America
  4. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  5. Constitutionally, the next time

Most Commented

  1. Work site arrests of illegals fall dramatically
  2. Top Republican lawmakers not invited to State Dinner
  3. Lobbyists spending big to shape health care debate
  4. Islamic center in Maryland keeps ties to Iran
  5. Schumer: Dems will pass health bill alone
More Top Stories »
  1. Green energy stimulus growing few jobs
  2. ANALYSIS: Obama takes a bow, but applause is weak
  3. EDITORIAL: Schumer's change of heart
  4. Senate Democrats win key vote on health bill
  5. EDITORIAL: Gunning for Sarah Palin

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

Do you think the White House should have invited more Republicans to the state dinner honoring Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Mason returns

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.