- ‘Welcome to the edge of freedom’: Biden’s boots touch down in DMZ
- Obama: Hole U.S. ‘digging out of’ requires billions more in unemployment benefits
- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
Dem factions curb Obama budget
Question of the Day
Forget about Republican objections. The biggest obstacle to President Obama’s progressive budget comes from Democrats from states with a lot of conservative voters, a lot of farms or a lot of old-time industry.
The factious caucus already has forced Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill to trim some of Mr. Obama’s spending plans and proposals, and will whittle the budget further as it moves through both chambers and a final conference committee negotiation.
“I think most Democrats have the approach that we are not here to represent the president. We’re here to represent the states that sent us here,” said Sen. Mark Pryor of Arkansas. “That means that even though we’re Democrats, our first priority is to do what’s right and what’s best for our states.”
With Mr. Obama largely relegated to the sidelines now, work by Senate and House committees Wednesday reflected the majority party’s competing regional and economic interests, some of which are at odds with the president’s $3.6 trillion plan.
Democrats catering to fiscally conservative states and districts succeeded in trimming the budget by $100 billion in both the chambers, while the Senate version also let Mr. Obama’s signature “Make Work Pay” tax cut expire after 2010 to help rein in future deficits.
Farm state lawmakers managed to save agriculture subsidies that Mr. Obama wanted to eliminate. That’s a fight White House budget director Peter R. Orszag said will continue as the party’s Hill leaders try to find other places to cut agriculture payments.
Mr. Orszag said the administration also will try to reverse other omissions, such as getting a long-term middle-class tax cut through a task force the president will set up to overhaul the tax code.
One of the most striking setbacks was on Mr. Obama’s ambitious energy and climate change agenda.
Rather than wrestle with Democrats from Rust Belt states opposed to Mr. Obama’s plans fight climate change with a cap-and-trade system to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, budget negotiators in both the House and Senate omitted the program and the $646 billion in “climate revenue” anticipated from selling pollution credits to businesses.
The White House nevertheless declared victory Wednesday, with Mr. Orszag claiming the House and Senate versions are “98 percent the same” as the administration’s plan.
“Yes, there are some differences, but I think the big story is how similar these two things are, rather than the small adjustments,” Mr. Orszag said in a conference call with reporters.
Besides omitting details for any of Mr. Obama’s top priorities of health care reform, education and green energy, both the Senate and the House omitted $250 billion that the administration wanted for future financial industry bailouts.
The House version projects a $1.2 trillion deficit for 2010 that drops to about $598 billion in 2014, similar to the Senate’s deficits of $1.2 trillion next year and $508 billion in 2014.
“You can go through almost anything in this budget and you will find at least one of the caucuses within our caucus would be raising issues about them,” said House Majority Whip James E. Clyburn, South Carolina Democrat. “But that’s what the legislative process is all about.”
Just as Democrats find themselves bargaining with their flanks, Republicans have been in the same awkward position in the past.
About the Author
Steven A Miller
- Massachusetts 'tossup' threatens Obama agenda
- Weiner blasts health care 'negotiation'
- Democrats chart dim midterm course
- McCain slams court decision
- Kaine: GOP 'civil war' ace in hole
Latest Blog Entries
Kara Rowland, White House reporter for The Washington Times, is a D.C.-area native. She graduated from the University of Virginia, where she studied American government and spent nearly all her waking hours working as managing editor of the Cavalier Daily, UVa.’s student newspaper.
Her interest in political reporting was piqued by an internship at Roll Call the summer before her ...
- London Olympics not everyone's cup of tea
- Obama hits road to push jobs plan
- Obama calls for the end of 'political circus' on economy, seeks stimulus plan for jobs
- Brennan: Al Qaeda is 'organization in distress'
- Hoffa's words about labor's importance brushed off
Latest Blog Entries
- Kill team: Obama war chiefs widen drone death zones
- Obama administration issues permits for wind farms to kill more eagles
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Craigslist killers: Police say newlyweds stabbed man for thrills
- Obama: Hole U.S. 'digging out of' requires billions more in unemployment benefits
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Rush Limbaugh: Obama trying to make Mandela death about himself
- NAPOLITANO: Pope Francis should be saving souls, not pocketbooks
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. and beyond.
Great discoveries in the world of restaurants and chefs fulfill the quest for delicious food and cooking.
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Dolloff and friends.
Red Alert focuses on the hottest political topics in the nation and calls Americans to action.
White House pets gone wild!