Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Pandemic’s impact on trade gauged

AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES
A worker sprays disinfectant over tables at a nursery school in Mexico City as the government tries to contain the outbreak of swine flu that as of Friday had taken 45 lives in Mexico. Economists see world trade being hampered by a wider outbreak.AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES A worker sprays disinfectant over tables at a nursery school in Mexico City as the government tries to contain the outbreak of swine flu that as of Friday had taken 45 lives in Mexico. Economists see world trade being hampered by a wider outbreak.

GENEVA | The onset of a global influenza pandemic could deal a serious blow to the limping world economy struggling to emerge from the worst recession in more than 60 years, economists and officials say.

Think tanks, financial analysts and World Bank economists have conducted studies of the possible implications of a swine flu pandemic. They used the 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) outbreak, which devastated the economies of China, Singapore, Hong Kong and Taiwan, and the threat of an Avian (H5N1) human bird flu pandemic of 2005-07 as benchmarks to estimate scenarios of the possible impact that a mild or severe pandemic would have on the world economy.

A study by the Lowy Institute of Sydney, Australia, estimates that under a mild pandemic scenario of 1.4 million deaths, global output would shrink by 0.7 percent, while a severe pandemic like the 1918 Spanish flu could claim up to 71.1 million lives and shave 4.8 percent off the world economy.

Dr. Keiji Fukuda, assistant director-general for health security and environment of the World Health Organization (WHO), told reporters Thursday that the important epidemiological feature of the swine flu virus is that “we continue to see human-to-human transmission, community-level transmission, primarily in North America. We are not seeing [that] yet anywhere else.”

He also tried to explain why the global health agency was paying so much attention to this outbreak even though so many of the influenza cases are mild.

“The situation is evolving; we still don’t know how the future will evolve,” he said.

“Will the virus change over time, over the next few months, and perhaps year, and become more dangerous than it is now? The big unknowns that were there a few weeks ago, they’re unknown today,” Dr. Fukuda said.

“If the virus becomes established outside North America, and if we do move into a pandemic, then our expectation is that we will see a large number of people infected worldwide. This is what typically happens with pandemics.

“So if you look at past pandemics, it would be a reasonable estimate to say that perhaps at least a third of the worlds population would get infected with this virus.”

A senior U.N. economist, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said, “If it takes hold, it could be terrible because the world economy is so weak.

“It would have a devastating effect on tourism, travel, the food industry and international trade in goods, among other sectors,” the official said.

Dr. Margaret Chan, WHO’s director-general, and other top officials at the Geneva-based global health agency are reminding health authorities and governments around the world that the current virus is a new phenomenon and not to get complacent and let their guard down.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon also weighed in this week.

“There is still much that is not known about the strain and the dangers it poses,” he said. “We should avoid a false sense of security. … In the face of uncertainty, we must be vigilant.”

The WHO’s pandemic alert stands at Phase 5, one step short of the onset of a global pandemic - triggered when sustained community transmission of the virus is taking place in at least two countries in two separate WHO-designated geographical regions.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Delegate Robert G. Marshall holds a book as he reads to the House during debate on a bill defining life at the moment of conception during the House session at the Capitol in Richmond, Va., Monday, Feb. 13, 2012.  (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

    Virginia House vote states life starts at conception

    By David Sherfinski - The Washington Times

  • A bomb specialist examines debris Tuesday in Bangkok where two explosions rocked a neighborhood. An Iranian man injured by a grenade he was carrying also was linked to a blast that ripped part of a roof off a house. (Associated Press)

    U.S. concerned about spike in Iran-Israel ‘shadow war’

    By Guy Taylor - The Washington Times

  • Mabus

    Naming of Navy ships returns to tradition

    By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          A President for the People

          T.J. O'Hara has joined the political ring, declaring his candidacy for President. If you agree America is in need of solutions rather than political tactics, his is a message worth reading.

          Riffs

          Find up-to-date information on the D.C. and Baltimore live music scenes and read interviews with artists and reviews of the latest releases and concerts.