- Article
- Comments ()
- Videos
Florida Gov. Charlie Crist's decision to run for the Senate is putting the Republican Party's anti-stimulus stand to the test, with Republican National Committee Chairman Michael S. Steele backing away from a threat to punish candidates who supported President Obama's signature economic recovery program.
For some Republicans heading into the 2010 elections, opposition to the giant $787 billion spending bill that Mr. Obama signed in February was seen as a litmus test for success, analogous to the opposition to President Clinton's 1993 tax increases that helped fuel a Republican congressional takeover a year later.
The February stimulus vote "was a stand-up moment for every Republican," Mr. Steele told a recent party rally in Wisconsin. About Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, whose defection to the Democrats earlier this month was in large part a result of his pro-stimulus vote, Mr. Steele said, "You voted yourself out of the party. We didn't kick you out."
But Mr. Crist's public embrace of the stimulus plan - including a joint appearance with Mr. Obama to hail the spending package - is clashing with the party's desperate drive to hold on to the seat being vacated by retiring Sen. Mel Martinez.
Key national Republicans, including Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, who chairs the party's 2010 senatorial campaign, and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky quickly endorsed Mr. Crist - despite his pro-stimulus stance - in advance of a potential primary fight.
Mr. Steele, despite his previous statements, said he won't be playing favorites as Florida Republicans choose their nominee.
RNC Communications Director Trevor Francis said in an e-mail that party rules "prohibit the Republican National Committee from contributing to or otherwise assisting pre-primary candidates without the prior written approval of the state party chairman, the national committeeman, and the national committeewoman. Unless that happens, and [the rule] is invoked, Chairman Steele and the RNC won't pick sides in the Florida Senate race."
Republicans are still betting that the stimulus vote will prove politically toxic for Democrats and point to 1993 as precedent. Democrats who backed President Clinton's tax-raising budget that year were among the major casualties as Republicans seized control of the Senate and House a year later.
Those protesting high government spending under Mr. Obama are "the same people who turned out in 1992 for Ross Perot and were the new voters that showed up in 1994 when we won the majority," said former House Majority Leader Dick Armey, Texas Republican, a leader of the recent nationwide "tea party" anti-spending rallies.
In the recent New York special House election, the failure of Republican candidate Jim Tedisco to come out strongly against Mr. Obama's spending plan cost him the seat, said Tom Lewis, Mr. Tedisco's campaign finance chairman.








Post a comment
There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!
Please login or register to post a comment