The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Times News Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
    • World
    • National
    • Politics
    • National Security
    • DC Area
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Technology
    • Investigations
    • Faith
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Headlines
    • Citizen Journalism
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Other
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
  • Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
    • Joe Giganti
    • Video Game Minute
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    CURL: West Point is site of historic Vietnam speech

  • Politics

    Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything

  • Food

    Obama pardons 'Courage,' the Thanksgiving turkey

  • Politics

    Obama to outline war plan at West Point

  • Politics

    Obama to attend Denmark climate summit

  • Business

    Initial jobless claims lowest in about year

  • National

    PULLEN: GOP came unmoored in last decade – it hurt

Home » Opinion » Editorials

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

EDITORIAL: Enemy in the mirror

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

The Army has a bigger problem than private guns

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen
  • Videos

More Editorials Stories

  • EDITORIAL: Kennedy vs. Catholicism
  • EDITORIAL: Obama's sacked inspector general
  • EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  • EDITORIAL: Terrorists use Democratic talking points

By

Suicide is the third-leading noncombat cause of death in the U.S. military, according to Department of the Army data. On at least one Army post, the response was a misguided effort to require some soldiers to register personal firearms.

The Army would not tell us how many soldiers have used private weapons to kill themselves. In the general population, firearms account for about half of all suicides nationwide each year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. However, owning a firearm doesn't raise the risk of playing Russian roulette, just as owning a car doesn't increase the risk of intentionally driving off a cliff in desperation like Thelma and Louise. There is an underlying intention that manifests from what physicians call "suicidal ideation," which is the process of thinking about and planning to end one's life.

Some overzealous Army commanders appear to categorize private gun ownership, rather than depression and desperation, as the problem. In March, soldiers in Charlie Company, 3rd Battalion, 187th Infantry Regiment of the 101st Airborne Division at Fort Campbell, Ky., were told they would have to start registering their privately owned arms with their command. Post spokesman Cathy Gramling told us that the order came from the "subordinate unit commander." The soldiers also were told to provide the storage location of their personal weapons along with information on their state-issued concealed carry permits. Ms. Gramling told us the commander who spearheaded the effort thought he was acting within his authority to address "a number of negligent discharges of privately owned weapons." The program has since been suspended.

An Army spokesman did not respond to repeated inquiries about the number of times such efforts to collect soldiers' personal gun-ownership data have occurred. However, he confirmed that it has happened before and acknowledged that it has been at least partially driven by the Army's suicide problem. "Every so often, this story bubbles up, and it is perceived to be an Army directive," Army spokesman Lt. Col. Nathan Banks told us. While noting that the Army does not have a directive or policy on the subject, he defended such registration efforts. "Based upon the recent high number of [personally owned weapons] accidents and fatalities, unit commanders are trying to determine just how many of their soldiers have" such weapons, he said.

The suicide problem is particularly acute in the Army, where at least 128 soldiers committed suicide in 2008. Last year saw the fourth straight annual increase. There were 67 suicides in 2004, according to Army data, and 60 in 2003, the year the United States invaded Iraq. There already have been 56 reported Army suicides through March of this year.

The needless loss of one life is one too many, but the Army trend is particularly worrisome. In 2008, the rate was 20.2 suicides per 100,000 soldiers, higher than the 11.1 per 100,000 national civilian average and higher than the roughly 19 per 100,000 civilian average when adjusted for the same gender and age group, according to the Army and the latest CDC data. The Army rate is a sharp increase from 16.8 per 100,000 in 2007 and 12.7 in 2005. In 2001, there were just 9.1 suicides per 100,000 soldiers.

Finding detailed information on the Army's suicide problem proved incredibly difficult. Army public affairs officials failed to respond to repeated requests over several weeks for details about the severity of the suicide problem, particularly those involving personal weapons. However, Mark Bates, a retired Air Force lieutenant colonel who is a clinical psychologist and interim director for resilience and prevention at the Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury - which oversees the Department of Defense's suicide prevention efforts -- told us that guns "are one of the top lethal means" for military suicides.

Lt. Col. Bates also noted that in order to establish something as a risk factor, you need to know how many people who experience a certain factor commit suicide and how many do not. If gun ownership is considered a risk factor, it is relevant that all soldiers are issued firearms at some point during their service.

Other factors come into play as well. While careful not to address the Army's registration efforts as each service branch controls its own internal affairs, Lt. Col. Bates said a number of causal factors ranging from health and family issues to the impacts of battle can contribute to suicidal behavior. "We have to be really careful," he said when asked if gun ownership is a possible risk factor. "We hear about the suicides involving certain issues, and it seems there has to be a connection. It appeals to internal logic, but if you look at the data, it can be surprising." Forget anti-gun or pro-gun ideology. Soldiers have access to firearms every day; it is unlikely that storing their own guns legally at home is a real risk factor.

The Defense Department can be applauded for some of its suicide-prevention efforts, including an advertising campaign to persuade fighters - toughened by battle in Iraq and Afghanistan - that it is OK to seek help fighting depression. The Army also has an unprecedented five-year, $50 million partnership with the National Institute of Mental Health aimed at providing a better understanding of why soldiers commit suicide. Still, more needs to be done. Something significant has changed in the lives of too many of our soldiers. The Army needs to find it and fix it before more die.

Registering guns is not the answer.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Please login or register to post a comment

Ask a Question

You Report

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
  3. Fenty trails Gray in D.C. poll
  4. Conservatives seek test for RNC funds
  5. Food snobs fork over $225 for taste of heritage turkey
More Top Stories »
  1. Religious leaders vow civil disobedience on anti-life issues
  2. PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine
  3. Company that repaired Chairman Gray's house lacked license
  4. KELLNER: New Apple mouse really is 'Magic'
  5. List of W.H. state dinner guests

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. EDITORIAL: Obama's sacked inspector general
  3. The United Socialist States of America
  4. EDITORIAL: Terrorists use Democratic talking points
  5. EDITORIAL: Kennedy vs. Catholicism
More Top Stories »
  1. 'Boutique' patients pay for better access to doctors
  2. Fenty trails Gray in D.C. poll
  3. Food snobs fork over $225 for taste of heritage turkey
  4. PULLEN: GOP came unmoored in last decade – it hurt
  5. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything

Most Commented

  1. EDITORIAL: Hiding evidence of global cooling
  2. Top Republican lawmakers not attending State Dinner
  3. Conservatives seek test for RNC funds
  4. PRUDEN: Obama's due process doctrine
  5. Climate 'czar' says hacked e-mails don't change anything
More Top Stories »
  1. EDITORIAL: Terrorists use Democratic talking points
  2. A-listers, fundraisers at W.H. state dinner
  3. Ky. hanging, ruled a suicide, leaves bloggers at loss for words
  4. EDITORIAL: Obama's sacked inspector general
  5. WH: Obama Afghan decision 'within days'

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin and Melanie Morgan

Question of the day

White House officials and Senate Democrats met in private three times last week to craft health care legislation. Do you think these discussions should be more public?

Blogs & Columns

  • Hot Button Blog

    RNC: Breast cancer recommendations may lead to 'rationing'

  • Belief Blog

    Evangelicals OK civil disobedience

  • Out of Context

    Foods that might kill libido

  • On the Fly

    United lifts some 'award' blocking

  • Technology

    Facebook wins round against phishing spammer

  • Redskins 360

    Gray coy about job

  • SNOBlog

    Beyond 'Woody'

Videos

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.