Two New England governors are facing a choice between their principles and their party as same-sex-marriage bills move nearer to landing on their desks.
New Hampshire Gov. John Lynch and Maine Gov. John Baldacci had staked out clear positions against gay marriage before this year’s legislative sessions. Then bills to extend marriage to same-sex couples began moving faster than expected through the Maine and New Hampshire legislatures.
The bills’ supporters and detractors have been divided largely along party lines, with Democratic legislators overwhelmingly in favor. The problem for Mr. Baldacci and Mr. Lynch is that they are Democrats, and New England Democrats who oppose gay marriage are increasingly rare.
“If you read the blogs, it’s almost like it’s become a litmus test for Democrats here, like abortion,” said Kevin Smith, executive director of Cornerstone Policy Research-Action in Manchester, N.H., which opposes same-sex marriage.
Janson Wu, staff attorney for Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders in Boston, disagreed. “I think this is a shift in the population in general, not just party lines,” he said.
Mr. Lynch likely will confront the issue first. Both houses of the New Hampshire legislature have passed same-sex-marriage legislation, although lawmakers still must reconcile differences in the House and Senate versions before sending a bill to the governor.
“He’s kind of in a box now because, on a number of occasions, he’s said he doesn’t support same-sex marriage and that he thinks marriage should be reserved for a man and a woman,” said Mr. Smith. “So now, is he going to go with what he said he would do, or what the party wants him to do?”
Democrats who oppose same-sex marriage find themselves under intense pressure to reconsider their stance.
State Sen. Deborah Reynolds, a Democrat who voted last month with Republicans against the New Hampshire bill in committee, said she didn’t think voters were ready for gay marriage.
A week later, she changed her mind and voted in favor of the bill on the Senate floor. The legislation passed Wednesday by a slim 13-11 margin amid rumors that Democrats were prepared to present a primary challenger to Ms. Reynolds unless she switched her vote.
“She got a pounding from Democrats in the state because of that [committee vote],” said New Hampshire political analyst Dean Spiliotes.
Mr. Lynch issued a statement last week reiterating his position on the issue but stopping short of saying he would veto the bill.
“I still believe the fundamental issue about providing the same rights and protections to same-sex couples as are available to heterosexual couples,” said Mr. Lynch. “This was accomplished through the passage of the civil-unions law two years ago.”
Mr. Lynch is expected to seek re-election next year, but even if he does veto the bill, analysts say, it’s unlikely he will face retribution from either his party or advocates of gay marriage. The governor holds a 70 percent approval rating and a personal fortune that makes him less dependent on special-interest funding.
“He’s been so effective, so popular that I think he could withstand a backlash from the left,” said Mr. Spiliotes. “If he vetoes this, there are going to be some people who are upset, but I don’t think that would stop him from winning another term.”View Entire Story
Valerie Richardson covers politics and the West from Denver. She can be reached at email@example.com.
'Your papers, please' must never be heard in America
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
The “Silver Tsunami” created by aging Baby Boomers is hitting America. Let’s explore how we adjust to it, enjoy it and defy negative expectations about age.
A carefully guided tour through the confusing world of modern bookselling and publishing.
Reflections on raising families in a holistic way -- with a focus on nutrition and alternative health.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall