Ballplayers to keep Stanford scheme funds

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

But he doesn’t think it will have wide-ranging impact on the handling of other Ponzi-type schemes.

Mr. Prickett said Ponzi schemes don’t tend to have the type of written agreements for “certificates of deposits” seen in the Stanford case.

“I think if people apply [the 5th Circuit opinion] based on its facts, it won’t have a ton of broader implications,” he said.

Mr. Stanford remains jailed awaiting trial on federal charges that he sold self-styled “certificate of deposits” that promised impossibly high returns but were said to be part of a Ponzi scheme that afforded Mr. Stanford a jet-setting lifestyle.

About the Author
Ben Conery

Ben Conery

Ben Conery is a member of the investigative team covering the Supreme Court and legal affairs. Prior to coming to The Washington Times in 2008, Mr. Conery covered criminal justice and legal affairs for daily newspapers in Connecticut and Massachusetts. He was a 2006 recipient of the New England Newspaper Association’s Publick Occurrences Award for a series of articles about ...

Latest Stories

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks