- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Question of the Day
Last week, while “the most traveled president in history” was on his latest foreign adventure and bowing to Japanese Emperor Akihito, the rest of the O-Team was busy kowtowing to political correctness. The headlines tell the story:
“Gates Condemns Leaks on Fort Hood Investigation,” and “Gates Says ‘Shut Up’ About Fort Hood.”
“Attorney General Eric Holder Announces Terror Trials in New York City for 9-11-01 Plotters.”
“Guantanamo Detainees to Illinois Prison.”
All three of these actions - the Gates outburst; the Holder decision to try Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and four other Sept. 11, 2001, conspirators in Manhattan’s federal court; and the plan to transfer nearly 200 radical Islamic terrorists to a state prison in western Illinois - have been decried as egregious examples of political correctness run amok.
Actually, coming as they did while President Obama was on a meaningless, ceremonial Asian junket, the “package deal for terrorists” is much worse than many imagine.
Mr. Gates’ admonitions regarding Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan - charged by the U.S. Army of murdering 13 soldiers and wounding 29 others at Fort Hood - have nothing to do with protecting the rights of the accused.
His misplaced anger is directed at those in our military and defense and intelligence agencies who have justifiable concerns about radical Islamic militants conducting acts of terror on American soil. Inside the Obama administration, muzzling critics is an accepted practice - even at the Pentagon.
The move to relocate up to 200 terrorists from the U.S. military detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and house them in the nearly vacant Thomson Correctional Center just outside Thomson, Ill., is a double whammy for the O-Team. It assuages leftist elites in the United States and Europe who have been grousing about delays in closing Gitmo and serves as a multimillion-dollar “stimulus” for Mr. Obama’s home state.
Though Rep. Tom Latham, a Republican from neighboring Iowa - directly across the Mississippi from the Thomson prison - wants to introduce a Keep Terrorists Out of the Midwest Act to prevent the move, it is already a fait accompli.
Sen. Richard Durbin, Illinois Democrat, immediately endorsed the idea, saying, “We should not let the unsupported and misplaced fears of a few stand in the way of this historic economic boost to our region.”
Mr. Holder’s decision to move the trials of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, Ramzi Bin al-Shibh, Walid bin Attash, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali and Mustafa Ahmed al-Hawsawi from the military tribunal system at Guantanamo to a federal courtroom in Manhattan - another sop to the global left - has generated the greatest heat in the media and on Capitol Hill. Notably, the announcement was made the same day Mr. Holder revealed that other accused terrorists being held at Gitmo would be tried by military courts.
Most attention has focused on whether the accused can get a fair trial, how classified information can be protected in an open court, and the possibility Mohammed and his cohorts might escape justice and go free.
On Nov. 18, in testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Mr. Holder dismissed the criticism, saying, “I’m not afraid of what Khalid Shaikh Mohammed has to say at trial - and no one else needs to be, either.” Mr. Obama went even further, telling reporters covering his Asia trip, “We’ll convict this person with the evidence they’ve got, going through the system.” That statement alone undoubtedly will be used by Mohammed’s lawyers to prove that he cannot get a fair trial just blocks away from ground zero, where the World Trade Center towers stood before the Sept. 11 attacks.
Unfortunately, nearly all of the comments and commentary miss the point. The real reason why we should all be concerned about the Fort Hood massacre, moving terrorists to U.S. prisons and show trials in New York is because there undoubtedly are other Nidal Hasans here in the U.S. The media circus in New York and Illinois will go on for years - inviting radical Islamist “sleepers” and “lone wolves” to attack.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
Get Breaking Alerts
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- DCCC raising money on suggestion Obama impeachment is 'imminent'
- U.S. evacuates embassy in Libya amid violent clashes between militias
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- CANNON: With Russia, different airline crash, same results
- 3 rockets hit Israel as Hamas rejects Gaza truce
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine