Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

9/11 defendants eye platform

associated press photographs Five defendants — from left, Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali, Waleed bin Attash, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi and Ramzi Binalshibh — won’t deny their role in the 2001 attacks, but “would explain … why they did it,” an attorney for one of them says.

NEW YORK | The five men facing trial in the Sept. 11 attacks will plead not guilty so that they can air their criticisms of U.S. foreign policy, the attorney for one of the defendants said Sunday.

Scott Fenstermaker, the attorney for terrorism suspect Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali, said the men would not deny their role in the 2001 attacks, but “would explain what happened and why they did it.”

The U.S. Justice Department announced earlier this month that Mr. Ali and four other men accused of murdering nearly 3,000 people in the deadliest terrorist attack in the United States would face a civilian federal trial just blocks from the site of the destroyed World Trade Center.

Ali, also known as Ammar al-Baluchi, is a nephew of professed Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed.

Mohammed, Ali and the others will explain “their assessment of American foreign policy,” Mr. Fenstermaker said.

“Their assessment is negative,” he said.

Mr. Fenstermaker met with Ali last week at the detention facility at the U.S. Naval Base Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. He has not spoken with the others, but said the men have discussed the trial among themselves.

Mr. Fenstermaker was first quoted in the New York Times in Sunday’s editions.

Critics of Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.’s decision to try the men in a New York City civilian courthouse have warned that the trial would provide the defendants with a propaganda platform.

Dean Boyd, a spokesman for the Department of Justice, said Sunday that while the men may attempt to use the trial to express their views, “we have full confidence in the ability of the courts and in particular the federal judge who may preside over the trial to ensure that the proceeding is conducted appropriately and with minimal disruption, as federal courts have done in the past.”

The attorney general said he does not think holding the trial in New York — at a federal courthouse that has seen a number of high-profile terrorism trials in recent decades — will increase the risk of terrorist attacks there.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Education Department deploys ‘mystery shoppers’ to check for fraud

    By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

  • Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney speaks at a campaign rally in Mesa, Ariz., on Monday. Arizona holds its GOP presidential primary on Feb. 28, the same day as Michigan, the home state of the former Massachusetts governor. (Associated Press)

    Romney finds tough times in Michigan

    By Andrea Billups - The Washington Times

  • Delegate Robert G. Marshall holds a book as he reads to the House during debate on a bill defining life at the moment of conception during the House session at the Capitol in Richmond, Va., Monday, Feb. 13, 2012.  (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

    Virginia House vote states life starts at conception

    By David Sherfinski - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Ingredients for Healthy Living

          Reflections on raising families in a holistic way -- with a focus on nutrition and alternative health.

          Rights So Divine

          Everyone has the divine rights as human beings because they were created in the image of God