- Obama downplays IRS scandal, blames Obamacare rollout on ‘outdated’ agencies
- Pregnancies decline overall, up among older women
- Pentagon plans to destroy Syrian chemical arms on ship at sea
- Paris Metro issues ‘politeness manual’ to improve passengers’ behavior
- Justin Bieber, crew detained at Australian airport in drug search
- Lee Rigby trial: Muslim who machete-hacked soldier calls it ‘humane’ kill
- GM ending Chevy sales in Europe to focus on Opel and Vauxhall
- Putin’s diplomats to U.S. busted for living high life off $1.5M bilked from Medicaid
- Happy Meal: Couple goes to McDonald’s, leaves with bag packed with cash
- Boehner: It took me 3 to 4 hours to sign up for Obamacare
Chasing Olympic gold
At the conclusion of the 1939 movie “Gone With The Wind,” Vivian Leigh, playing Scarlett O’Hara, defers decision on what to do about the major crisis in her life with the phrase, “After all, tomorrow is another day.”
Unfortunately, the Obama White House seems to have adopted Scarlett’s decision-making process for the war in Afghanistan. Note to the O-Team: Kabul isn’t Tara - and Americans are dying while the commander in chief dithers.
On Sept. 30, a full month after Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal submitted his “assessment” of the situation in Afghanistan, President Obama convened a three-hour meeting of his “national security team” in the White House Situation Room to “discuss next moves.” According to information subsequently provided by the White House press office, Gen. McChrystal “participated in the meeting” via an encrypted video link, and no decisions were made.
Less than 24 hours later, the commander in chief boarded Air Force One and headed - not to meet with his commander on the field of battle - but to Copenhagen to meet with the International Olympic Committee.
His unsuccessful mission: to persuade the IOC to select Chicago as the site for the 2016 summer games. Apparently, trying to win Olympic gold for Chicago was more important than winning a war.
That’s not just my opinion - that’s the sense of many who have put their lives on the line in Afghanistan. On Wednesday, as the “Sit Room” meeting was ongoing, I was with a grievously wounded Navy SEAL at the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda. His concern was not about his own life-threatening injuries - but for his mates, carrying on the fight without him.
Later that evening, a military officer in Kabul offered this evaluation: “This is only the second time that the president has talked to Gen. McChrystal. We still don’t have any decisions. We don’t know what we’re going to get or when we will get it. What we do know is that what we have isn’t enough to win.” Press reports say Gen. McChrystal told the meeting that the situation in Afghanistan is “serious” and “deteriorating.”
The White House press secretary now says the Sept. 21 meeting was the beginning of a “thorough review of the options and strategy” for Afghanistan and that at least “three more strategy sessions have been scheduled.” That’s not good news. Time is not an ally in this fight. Indecision is an enemy in every war. The trip to Copenhagen was an unnecessary distraction.
The O-Team’s vacillation is proving costly on the battlefield - and politically damaging here at home. The primary opponents to doing what needs to be done in Afghanistan are leaders in Mr. Obama’s own party - on Capitol Hill and in Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s office.
On the eve of this week’s belated White House “review session,” 50 Democrats in the House of Representatives signed a letter urging the president not to send any additional troops to Afghanistan until he crafts “a well-defined military exit strategy.” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, already on record opposing any troop increase in Afghanistan, says there is “no appetite” in Congress for “escalation.”
Mr. Biden supports a “less is more” counterterrorism campaign using Special Operations troops, air strikes and unmanned aerial vehicles to attack Taliban targets in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Unfortunately, this is precisely the “offshore” approach pursued by the Clinton administration after the 1993 al Qaeda attack on the World Trade Center. The effectiveness of this strategy was evident on Sept. 11, 2001.
On March 27, following a “careful policy review,” Mr. Obama proclaimed Afghan-istan and Pakistan as “the central front in the war on terror,” announced a “comprehensive new strategy” for the region and ordered 21,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan, increasing the number of Americans there to 68,000 by the end of this year. A month and a half later, he made Gen. McChrystal - an advocate of pursuing a counterinsurgency campaign - the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan.
On Aug. 17, the president declared, “This is not a war of choice; it is a war of necessity. Those who attacked America on 9/11 are plotting to do so again. If left unchecked, the Taliban insurgency will mean an even larger safe haven from which al Qaeda could plot to kill more Americans.”
Those statements were true then - and they are true today. The counterinsurgency strategy for how to win in Afghanistan has been carefully prepared by Gen. McChrystal. If Mr. Obama wants to be remembered for something other than playing politics with the Olympics, he needs to bring Gen. McChrystal to Washington and have him testify before Congress - and soon.
About the Author
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality: liberal group
- NAPOLITANO: Pope Francis should be saving souls, not pocketbooks
- Obama returns to class warfare as poll numbers plunge
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
- CARSON: Getting to the top by starting at the bottom
- U.S. drops 2,000 mice on Guam by parachute to kill snakes
- Russian diplomats busted bilking $1.5 million from Medicaid
- CURL: 'Mission Accomplished' for Obamacare
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- U.S. debt jumps a record $328 billion tops $17 trillion for first time