3 convicted of plotting 9/11-style terror attacks

LONDON | Three British Muslims were convicted Monday of plotting to kill thousands by downing at least seven airliners bound for the U.S. and Canada in what was intended as the largest terrorist attack since Sept. 11.

A jury at a London court found Abdulla Ahmed Ali, 28; Assad Sarwar, 29; and Tanvir Hussain, 28, guilty of conspiracy to murder by detonating explosives on aircraft while they were in-flight.

Four other purported conspirators - whom the prosecution said were to have smuggled liquid explosives disguised as soft drinks aboard jetliners - were acquitted of conspiring to blow up planes. The jury could not reach a verdict on an eighth man.

British and U.S. security officials said the plan - unlike many recent homegrown European terrorist plots - was directly linked to al Qaeda and guided by senior Islamic militants in Pakistan, who hoped to mount a spectacular strike on the West.

The officials said British plotters were likely just days away from mounting their suicide attacks when police rounded up 25 people in dawn raids in August 2006.

Their arrests led to travel chaos as hundreds of jetliners were grounded across Europe. Discovery of the plot also triggered changes to airport security, including new restrictions on the amount of liquids and gels passengers can take onto flights.

Prosecutors said suspects had identified seven specific flights from London’s Heathrow Airport to New York, Washington, Chicago, San Francisco, Toronto and Montreal as their targets.

British authorities estimate that, if successful, the plot would have killed around 2,000 people. If bombs had been detonated over U.S. and Canadian cities, hundreds more would have been killed on the ground.

Plotters planned to assemble bombs in airplane toilets using hydrogen peroxide-based explosives injected into soda bottles.

“They were to be detonated in-flight by suicide bombers,” including several of the accused, prosecutor Peter Wright said.

Tests by scientists who replicated the bombs in a laboratory showed the devices could produce powerful explosions, though there is no evidence that the terrorist cell had perfected the technique.

Mr. Wright told the trial that the group’s suicide attacks were planned by “men with the cold-eyed certainty of the fanatic” and intended as “a violent and deadly statement of intent that would have a truly global impact.”

He said the plot would have caused “a civilian death toll from terrorism on an almost unprecedented scale.”

All eight defendants had denied most of the charges against them, claiming they were planning a stunt - and not a terrorist attack - to expose failings in Western foreign policy.

Prosecutors were unable to produce evidence that the men had produced a single viable bomb. The trial was the second to take place in a case that has frustrated prosecutors.

Story Continues →