EDITORIAL: Inartful politics

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By THE WASHINGTON TIMES

National Endowment for the Arts Chairman Rocco Landesman owes American taxpayers an explanation.

Last month, a top NEA official gathered artists and arts organizations in a conference call that also included a White House official and clearly asked the arts community to get behind the administration's agenda, including the current top priority, health care. A mere 48 hours after the request, 21 art organizations led by an arts lobbying organization, Americans for the Arts, released the first of two public statements endorsing health care reform and urging Congress to act.

Such a meeting would be disturbing enough -- a grant-maker backed by the White House asking grant recipients to support the administration agenda crosses the line from persuasion to coercion. Artists and arts groups that want funding from the NEA to continue cannot help but feel pressure to comply with the administration's wishes. That alone is wrong.

Health reform backers get seven-figure grants

However, when you add in the nearly $2 million the NEA handed out to those very arts organizations in the four months before the conference call -- including more than $1 million in stimulus funds -- it is time to start wondering whether a line has been crossed from merely unethical into the land of special prosecutors. Such an investigation might be the only way to get straight answers.

So far, the administration's response has been a stonewall. Yosi Sergant, then NEA communications director, denied that the NEA had organized the call or that he even had a copy of invitations to join the call. That was not true. A copy of the e-mail invitation from Mr. Sergant himself through his NEA e-mail account is now available on the Web. After this episode, the NEA communications office no longer responded to phone calls or e-mail.

NEA statements at odds with facts

Days afterward, Mr. Sergant was demoted to some unknown position in the NEA. In announcing the demotion, the NEA's unattributed statement continued Mr. Sergant's factual frugality. Among the whoppers: The conference call wasn't anything special because the NEA "regularly does outreach to various organizations to inform of the work we are doing and the resources available to them."

But here's what then NEA Communications Director Sergant said on the conference call: "This is just the beginning. This is the first telephone call of a brand-new conversation. We are just now learning how to really bring this community together to speak with the government, what that looks like legally."

Unless "change" in the Obama administration includes new meanings for "beginning" and "first" and "brand-new," then there are slight discrepancies between what Mr. Sergant said in a private phone call and what the NEA claims in public. If life in Washington teaches anything, it is that words said in private are far more likely to be true than words cooked up for public consumption.