- Obama not worried about Ebola at upcoming African summit in D.C.
- Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11
- Obama administration asked whole D.C. Circuit to take on major Obamacare case
- Mark Levin: Topple GOP leadership or country will ‘unravel’
- Massachusetts to let police chief deny gun buys to those deemed unfit
- John Kerry condemns attack on Israeli soldiers, kidnapping
- U.S. starts to evacuate American Ebola patients from West Africa: Report
- Geraldo slammed as ‘dummy’ for backing Clinton’s bin Laden claim
- Israeli spokesman: No need to debate who broke the cease-fire
- 35 Palestinians killed; Israeli officer missing
Policy shift raises E.U. hopes on Russia
Question of the Day
DRESDEN, Germany | President Obama’s decision to scrap a land-based missile-defense system has sent expectations soaring among U.S. allies in Europe of some sort of thaw in Russia’s often chilly ties with the West.
Some such as German Chancellor Angela Merkel spoke in general terms about a new era of cooperation with Russia. Others such as NATO’s new secretary-general, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, spoke of possible integration of Russian and NATO technology.
“We should explore the potential for linking the U.S., NATO and Russia missile-defense systems at an appropriate time,” Mr. Rasmussen said. “Both NATO and Russia have a wealth of experience in missile defense. We should now work to combine this experience to our mutual benefit.”
There was praise from Russia as well, as if the new American president had acquiesced to a long-sought demand by Moscow.
That left it to Mr. Obama himself to dampen expectations Sunday while appearing on the television talk show circuit.
“My task here was not to negotiate with the Russians,” Mr. Obama told CBS News. “The Russians don’t make determinations about what our defense posture is.”
Since the U.S. announcement on Thursday, speculation gripped Europe over Mr. Obama’s decision to replace a land-based anti-missile system in Poland and the Czech Republic aimed at long-range rockets with one initially based at sea and targeted at short-range missiles.
Europeans were hopeful that Russia would respond by supporting tougher sanctions against Iran and will not take advantage of the move to flex its influence in Eastern Europe.
So far, however, there is no little evidence of a seismic shift in relations between Washington and Moscow. Moscow did announce Saturday that it will not station short-range missiles near Poland — a deployment that Russia had threatened if the U.S. went ahead with a land-based missile defense plan.
President Dmitry Medvedev chose to be positive and straightforward, calling Mr. Obama’s decision to abandon sites in Poland and the Czech Republic a “responsible move.”
“Iran must cooperate with IAEA, that’s for sure, if they want to develop their nuclear energy program. It is their duty, not a choice. Otherwise, indeed, the question will be asked always, what are they up to after all? That’s very clear,” Mr Medvedev told CNN.
Prime Minister Vladimir Putin called the U.S. plan a “right and brave decision.” But instead of offering a hint of what Russia might do to reciprocate, as his Western counterparts expected, he demanded more such actions from Washington.
To make sure there was no misunderstanding, he cited specific concessions he wants from the Obama administration: lifting U.S. restrictions on transfers of sensitive technology to Russia and U.S. support for membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO) not only for Russia, which the George W. Bush administration backed, but also for former Soviet republics Belarus and Kazakhstan.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton tried again to convince doubters of Mr. Obama’s motivation that they are misguided. “This decision was not about Russia. It was about Iran, and the threat that its ballistic missile program poses,” she said Friday at the Brookings Institution.
National security adviser James L. Jones told The Washington Times on Saturday that the decision was driven by U.S. intelligence concerns over Iran’s rapid development of short-range missiles. Mr. Jones did, however, concede the possibility of “an ancillary benefit” in overall U.S.-Russia relations.
About the Author
Nicholas Kralev is The Washington Times’ diplomatic correspondent. His travels around the world with four secretaries of state — Hillary Rodham Clinton, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell and Madeleine Albright — as well as his other reporting overseas trips inspired his new weekly column, “On the Fly.” He is a former writer for the weekend edition of the Financial Times and ...
- State Department to increase 'nonimmigrant' visa fees
- State Department to increase 'nonimmigrant' visa fees
- International court since '02 hasn't rushed to any judgments
- International court's progress slow
- Chile holds Pakistani after U.S. pulls visa
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Isaac Orr
New carbon-dioxide rules would put America in the dark
- House GOP resurrects border bill, predicts successful Friday vote
- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Border agents cleared of civil rights complaints from illegal immigrant children
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Porn-surfing feds blame boredom, lack of work for misbehavior
- Ben Carson takes major step toward presidential campaign
- Feds raid S.C. home to seize Land Rover in EPA emission-control crackdown
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Ted Nugent slams 'lying freaks' at liberal media: I'm 'doing God's work'
- Pentagon wants extra $19M to equip, train Ukrainian troops
Top 10 U.S. military helicopters
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors