The Obama administration has signaled its concern for the Democratic Republic of Congo by sending Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton there last month, but restoring stability will require a long-term commitment of money, education, military training and enough political will to force Central African governments to hammer out a sustainable peace.
“The atrocities that these women have suffered, which stands for the atrocities that so many have suffered, distills evil into its basest form,” Mrs. Clinton said in the regional capital of Goma.
However, Mrs. Clinton also told aid workers that she did not want “to overpromise.”
“I am not just here to leave a business card, but I don’t have a magic wand, either … . It is ultimately up to the people here.”
More than 5 million Congolese have died in civil strife in the past decade. Most are noncombatants, and many were victims of hunger, rape and disease.
Mrs. Clinton told the Congolese government that the $17 million in new funding would go to provide more medical care, counseling and economic and legal support for rape survivors. Some of the funds will train doctors to perform the delicate surgery needed to repair the terrible physical damage suffered by the victims of gang rape.
About $3 million will be used to recruit and train more police officers, particularly women, to work on sexual-violence cases, which often go unpunished in Congo.
Mrs. Clinton also said that the Pentagon's U.S. Africa Command would deploy a team of civilian experts, medical personnel and military engineers to assess how to provide more assistance to rape victims.
The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) estimates total U.S. aid to Congo will amount to $200 million this year, compared with $150 million in 2007. In addition to assisting rape victims, the money will go for economic development programs, food and support for U.N. peacekeeping operations.
Before the Clinton visit, Africa specialists said the U.S. had paid too little attention to a country still reeling from the overflow of the 1994 Rwandan genocide, feeble national institutions and continuing interference by neighbors that covet Congo’s mineral wealth.
“There seems to be some conventional wisdom forecasted that the need for extensive U.S. policy in the DRC is over because the war is officially over,” said Howard Wolpe, director of the Africa program at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and a former Democratic congressman from Michigan. “This is not the case.”View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
By Douglas Holtz-Eakin
The young drop coverage to avoid higher premiums
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
Looking at pop culture, politics and social issues.
Political commentary and literary criticism in an era of eroding liberty
First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention
California wildfires wreak havoc