- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
- John Boehner says GOP should support gay candidates: ‘I do’
- Grass-Whopper: Pan-fried cricket burgers go over big in New York City
Agencies told to lay down law on Gray
Question of the Day
Two days after the District’s campaign-finance investigators “exonerated” D.C. Council chairman and mayoral candidate Vincent C. Gray for allowing a city developer to improve his home, D.C. Attorney General Peter Nickles blasted a pair of city agencies for failing to enforce the law on a pattern of building-code violations by Mr. Gray.
“Something doesn’t sound right,” Mr. Nickles said Friday as the D.C. Department of Transportation (DDOT) for the third time in a month threatened to fine Mr. Gray $300 each day he continues to skirt the law. “What concerns me is whether city agencies are fearful they will be treated badly when they have matters before the city council.”
Last week in interviews with The Washington Times, Mr. Nickles was reacting to a more than three-month delay by Mr. Gray to file a public-space permit application for a 6-foot-high aluminum fence he built in 2008 around his $667,000 house, which sits on a corner lot in the Hillcrest section of Southeast Washington.
On Monday, Mr. Nickles said the fines would begin on Tuesday.
Officials at DDOT and the Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs (DCRA), which also must sign off on the permit, declined to comment.
Questions concerning the fence surfaced in December after The Times reported that Mr. Gray allowed W. Christopher Smith Jr., a major developer, personal friend, campaign donor and president of a company on whose projects Mr. Gray has voted, to oversee a home-renovation plan and other repairs also completed without permits.
On Wednesday, the Office of Campaign Finance concluded that there was “no evidence to suggest that [Mr. Gray’s] official actions or judgment or votes would be influenced by [Mr. Smith] in exchange for the work performed at his home” because the developer’s construction company had charged market rates for the work.
That investigation was limited to suspected campaign violations and did not address the issue of Mr. Gray’s failure to file the permits.
On Friday, Mr. Nickles said he was “mystified” that Mr. Gray had yet to file a completed permit application for the fence and a stone retaining wall installed two years ago. Because the improvements are in public space and because Mr. Gray’s fence exceeds normal height restrictions, he also must get approval from a special committee.
“Why does The Washington Times, two years after the fact, have to alert us that such a large project was done without permits?” Mr. Nickles said. “Then, once we know, why doesn’t the city deal with it immediately? That’s what an ordinary citizen would expect.”
In a press release last week, Mr. Gray’s office declared him “exonerated” in the campaign-finance matter and insisted that his attorney, former D.C. Attorney General Robert J. Spagnoletti, was “working expeditiously to correct any unresolved issues.” It also said Mr. Gray had never “tried to skirt any regulations or laws.”
On Monday, Mr. Gray’s spokeswoman, Doxie McCoy, denied that the attorney general’s office or any other agency had reason to think they should not carry out their responsibilities or enforce the law.
“There has never been any indication that they would be treated unfairly or subject to any kind of bad treatment by the council, and it is unfortunate, if in fact they really feel that way,” she said. “There is absolutely no basis for any reported hesitance or concern.”
Since 2008, DDOT has granted 23 permits for “over-height fences in public space,” said John Lisle, a spokesman for the department. He could not say whether any of those approvals were granted two years after a fence was built.
D.C. officials have been asking Mr. Gray to resolve a series of permit issues since December. Although he retroactively obtained permits for electrical wiring installed at his home by Mr. Smith’s subcontractors, Mr. Gray still needs approval from DDOT’s Public Space Committee before DDOT and DCRA can sign off on it.
About the Author
Jeffrey Anderson is an investigative reporter for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Bradley Manning, as Chelsea Manning, pens thank-you to MLK from prison
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- NAPOLITANO: Pope Francis should be saving souls, not pocketbooks
- Kill team: Obama war chiefs widen drone death zones
- Pope Franciss colorful past: Gods nightclub bouncer
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality
- MOVIE REVIEW: 'Out of the Furnace'
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
The Constitution: Every issue, every time. No exceptions, no excuses. And how to get from here to there.
Why can’t humans just be free to be humans?
Get in the middle of all the action inside and outside the boxing ring.
Find the latest news and happening that effect those in the Washington D.C., Northern Virginia and Maryland Metro region.
White House pets gone wild!