- Donald Rumsfeld has ‘no idea’ if he paid taxes correctly
- Bradley Manning named honorary grand marshal of San Francisco Pride parade
- Look out PayPal: Facebook working toward mobile payments system
- U.S. rebukes Iran’s U.N. envoy pick over 1979 embassy attack
- Stoned mom avoids jail after driving 12 miles with baby on roof
- More than 100 ‘inappropriate’ encounters between NYC school staffers, students since 2009: report
- Joe Biden to Boston bombing survivors: ‘America will never, ever stand down’
- FBI failed to throughly vet Boston bombing suspect after Russian lead, report finds
- Atlanta Braves flooded with Hank Aaron hate mail: He’s a ‘scumbag’
- University: Help, our campus is too white
GREENBURY: Greens tear into paper producers
Environmentalists also have an obligation to truth
The most activist nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) try to apply universal standards and unwavering timelines to every geography on the planet, to every company and every population, regardless of the stage of growth and development in which an economy finds itself. “Progress” is always dismissed as being too little. One moral standard and a single cultural behavior are expected, without regard to the diversity of people and rules of independent sovereign nations.
Oftentimes this rigidity is reflected in the information and reports promoted by these groups. At best, such materials have as their hallmark exaggerated information and, at worst, content that can be unverifiable and false.
But the real danger behind uncompromising positions and tactics that suggest falsehoods is that such actions ultimately cause long-term damage. The constructive dialogue that can drive the solutions these NGOs seek is, in fact, diminished, along with public trust around the ability of NGOs, government and the private sector to work together productively for human progress.
A recent report from Greenpeace criticizing our company, Indonesian-based Asia Pulp and Paper (APP), around our environmental and conservation record is such an example. The report was developed without input from us and asserts, among other things, that APP has a “secret plan” to expand its pulp mills exponentially and cut down high-conservation-value forests, including those that are home to endangered tigers.
The claim that APP seeks to increase its current pulping capacity is not only false but illogical. It would take roughly 8 million hectares (19.77 million acres) gross to support the production of 17 million tons of pulp, as Greenpeace purports. Yet the total land mass allocated for pulpwood plantations in Indonesia is only about 10 million hectares (24.71 acres) to support legal and sustainable plantation forestry. What’s more, APP’s pulpwood suppliers operate pulpwood plantations, according to the government of Indonesia’s Spatial Plan, the foundation of the country’s land-use laws, which set aside nearly half of all land for conservation. APP supports the protection of more than 100,000 hectares (247,105 acres) of production forest to serve as the core of the Senepis Sumatran Tiger Sanctuary in Riau province. This pioneering initiative is actively contributing to the survival of this species, not its extinction.
Greenpeace has been wrong before. The group’s 2006 Guide to Greener Electronics, which rated consumer electronics manufacturers on their use of toxic chemicals and recycling plans, was questioned for its methodology and errors by several companies named in the report, including Apple, a company that enjoys a sound environmental reputation recognized by the Sierra Club.
There are other examples of an absence of due diligence among NGOs: In 2008, the Rainforest Action Network (RAN) said orangutans are predicted to become extinct as early as 2011, which, not surprisingly, raised the ire of people around the world. RAN later admitted that the figure was inaccurate, and a company spokesperson said, “We are a campaigning organization, so research is not our main thrust.”
NGOWatch, a project of Global Governance Watch, which seeks to hold NGOs accountable to the same standards they insist on from government and the private sector, has noted that one group, Green America (formerly Co-Op America) does not actively employ economics or cost-benefit analysis to assess the role and contributions of corporations in America and instead promotes any campaign, regardless of its veracity, that is anti-business.
About 25 years ago, environmentalist Jay Westerveld coined the term “greenwashing” to describe insincere corporate environmental behaviors. It’s a watchword that businesses, including ours, take seriously. But the shoe is increasingly on the other foot. A 2008 paper published in the journal Biotropica introduced “blackwashing” to our vernacular, a term to describe the practice of exaggerating and making false claims by activist groups.
Regardless of the finger-pointing from either side, the truth is, developing practices and processes that fulfill forest and forest-product certification criteria, and indeed crafting conservation programs in general, is complicated and not without challenges.
Rather than going to extremes, activist NGOs should adopt an approach that focuses their resources and efforts on attainable solutions that balance the complex and interconnected needs of all parties in the environmental debate.
We are not opposed to making dramatic progress in improving our environment and further protecting and expanding the protected lands around the world. In fact, APP is leading that dramatic progress. However, unlike many NGOs, we have a responsibility to the people and the governments that are our partners to both protect the land on which they live and provide the jobs that keep food on the table. We embrace and already are advancing sustainable practices in Indonesia and other nations. We comply fully with externally audited Legal Origin Verification and Chain of Custody systems and protocols, and our main paper mills have been certified by the Program for the Endorsement of Forest Certification.
We know that progress is being made in protecting rainforests and increasing the amount of land protected, but that progress must be aligned with the needs of the people who live and work around them. Companies, like APP, are on the front lines every day and have to balance both requirements and are dedicated to making progress in both. That’s our commitment to sustainability, and it is real. NGOs should help us as partners achieve these goals, not become our adversaries in the effort.
Aida Greenbury is managing director for sustainability and stakeholder engagement for Asia Pulp & Paper Group. The company, headquartered in China and Indonesia, markets its products in 65 countries.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By returning to goodness, the nation can achieve greatness once again
Get Breaking Alerts
- Fuel-filled wings, ability to swarm: Pentagon offers glimpse at future of drone fleet
- Secret U.S. assessments show Afghanistan not ready to govern on own
- U.S. military on high alert as Ukraine troops trade gunfire with pro-Russian militants
- Russian fighter jet buzzes U.S. Navy destroyer in Black Sea
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Donald Rumsfeld has 'no idea' if he paid taxes correctly
- Wal-Mart forced to apologize for 'mistake' favoring English-speaking shoppers
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Solution to Cyprus dispute is no 'mistake'
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama's real wealth redistribution scheme
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obamacare numbers nothing to celebrate
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Unanswered bus-crash questions
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Lerner won't face meaningful punishment