- ‘Gay Jeans’ that fade into rainbow-colored denim created
- Divided court strikes down big porn award
- Jimmy Carter: Don’t hurt Russian people with sanctions
- Oldest ex-MLB player dies in Cuba, 2 days shy of 103rd birthday
- ‘Top Gun’ for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy’s approval
- Bill Clinton to endorse Charlie Rangel for re-election
- Pfc. Bradley Manning is now Pfc. Chelsea Manning: Court says so
- Secret base U.S. special forces used to train Libyans now under terrorist control: report
- 9th suspect in N.C. kidnapping turns self in to FBI
- L.A. sheriff admits to testing flyover spy program without notifying residents
Inside the Beltway
They definitely did not Tweet it. The American Bird Conservancy, Center for Biological Diversity, Association of Avian Veterinarians and other groups have petitioned the Environmental Protection Agency to ban lead in hunting ammunition and fishing tackle, claiming that 20 million birds and animals die of lead poisoning each year - justifying their demands through the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act.
Nonsense, counters the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), a trade association.
“There is simply no scientific evidence that the use of traditional ammunition is having an adverse impact on wildlife populations that would require restricting or banning the use of traditional ammunition beyond current limitations,” says NSSF President Steve Sanetti, who points out U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service data shows that breeding pairs of bald eagles have increased 724 percent in recent years.
Mr. Sanetti also draws attention to the federal excise tax ammunition manufacturers - 11 percent - is a primary source of wildlife conservation funding.
“Hunters and their ammunition have done more for wildlife than the Center for Biological Diversity ever will,” observes NSSF General Counsel Lawrence G. Keane.
POLL JU JOUR
62 percent of Americans say things are going “very/moderately badly” for the U.S. in Afghanistan.
55 percent of Democrats and 24 percent of Republicans approve of the way President Obama is handling the situation in Afghanistan.
36 percent of Americans overall approve of Mr. Obama’s handling of Afghanistan.
52 percent say the U.S. was right to send troops to Afghanistan.
43 percent say it was a mistake.
Source: A USA Today/Gallup Poll of 1,208 adults conducted July 27 to Aug. 1.
Tip line always open at firstname.lastname@example.org.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Inside the Beltway: A presidential showcase for Mike Pence
- 10 state tour: Tea party bus rolls in the name of liberty - and the midterms
- Inside the Beltway: The Elizabeth Warren effect
- They're next: Alaska fumes over marijuana legalization
- 'Scott Walker 2016': Here comes the bumper sticker
Latest Blog Entries
- A startling 20 percent of Democratic lawmakers already endorse Hillary Clinton for president
- Hey food police: calling obesity a 'disease' is actually a health risk
- Cheese and an 'enhanced experience': White House goes showbiz on the State of the Union address
- Cruz calls it a 'circus': the State of the Union spectacle begins
- Half of American fans say God and 'supernatural' forces are in play during sports events
TWT Video Picks
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Obama's veil of secrecy is pierced
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- Pentagon plans to replace flight crews with 'full-time' robots
- Kansas will nullify local regulation of guns
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- CARSON: When government looks more like foe than friend
- Opposition rising to Colorado gun control laws
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Obama avoids 'red line' for China; prepared to impose tougher sanctions on Russia
- Protesters, police clash in Philippines ahead of Obama visit
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Celebrity deaths in 2014