AP Interview: S.Africa concerned at costs of AIDS
But in an interview marking World AIDS Day Wednesday, Dr. Aaron Motsoaledi said his government has no choice but to keep spending.
“If we stop anything, we will just reverse all our gains,” he said, adding that if better decisions had been made and stronger action taken earlier, costs would be lower now.
Last year on the day devoted to taking stock of the fight against AIDS, President Jacob Zuma gained worldwide praise by pledging an ambitious testing and treatment campaign and more vigorous efforts to stop the disease’s spread. Motsoaledi is in charge of the campaign, and has been praised for his energy and openness by AIDS activists who repeatedly clashed with a previous health minister who promoted beets and garlic over AIDS drugs and questioned the link between the HIV virus and AIDS.
Gail Eddy of the South African Institute of Race Relations, one of the country’s oldest and most respected independent social research centers, said there are already signs of results that could be linked to a shift that began even before Zuma’s announcement last year. The institute points to a lower HIV rate among young South Africans, and gradual gains in life expectancy, to about 50.
Still, an estimated 5.7 million people in this country of 50 million are infected with HIV, more than in any other country.
A report by an international team of experts commissioned by the South African government concluded that under the current AIDS plan, $88 billion will be spent over the next two decades, with the number of new infections falling gradually from 500,000 to about 350,000 annually. The report outlined a more ambitious plan that would cost $102 billion over the same period, and bring the number of new infections down to under 200,000 a year.
Even under the best circumstances, another 5 million South Africans will be infected over the next 20 years, the researchers concluded. Motsoaledi said the study may be overly pessimistic.
The South African government itself pays for 80 percent of AIDS care and prevention programs. International donors take care of the rest, usually in direct payments to private groups.
“We are very much concerned,” he said.
This year, donors committed $11.7 billion to The Global Fund that tackles AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria, a major source of AIDS funds, over the next three years. That was 20 percent more than was pledged for 2008-2010, but far below the $17 billion the United Nations says is needed.
The U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, another major funder of AIDS programs around the world, had a modest increase, from $6.8 billion in 2010 to nearly $7 billion for 2011.
The international medical aid group Medecins Sans Frontieres marked World AIDS Day by expressing concern about funding at a time when new strategies for combatting the disease call for putting people on medication earlier _ a costly step over a lifetime of treatment that South Africa adopted as policy for certain categories of patients, such as those with tuberculosis, in April.
Despite that, the country is unable to provide antiretroviral treatment for half of those who need it. Only an estimated 1.2 million people are receiving medication at public facilities, with another million or more going untreated, said Mark Heywood, deputy chairman of South Africa’s National AIDS Council.