RICHMOND (AP) — A federal judge rejected a key provision of the Obama administration’s health care law as unconstitutional Monday, ruling the government cannot require people to buy insurance, in a dispute that both sides agree will ultimately be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.
U.S. District Judge Henry E. Hudson is the first federal judge to strike down the law, which has been upheld by two other federal judges in Virginia and Michigan. Several other lawsuits have been dismissed, and others are pending, including one filed in Florida by 20 other states.
The government argued the Commerce Clause of the Constitution gives the government the power to require individuals to buy health insurance or face a penalty, a provision due to take effect in 2014.
“This case, however, turns on atypical and uncharted applications of constitutional law interwoven with subtle political undercurrents,” Judge Hudson wrote. “The outcome of this case has significant public policy implications. And the final word will undoubtedly reside with a higher court.”
The White House said that the ruling does not create uncertainty about the implementation of the law’s provisions.
Ms. DeParle told the Associated Press that the Justice Department is reviewing Judge Hudson’s ruling. The department, which defended the law in court, stood by its argument that Congress was within its rights to enact the law.
“We are disappointed in today’s ruling but continue to believe — as other federal courts in Virginia and Michigan have found — that the Affordable Care Act is constitutional,” said Justice Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler.
The lawsuit was filed by Mr. Cuccinelli, a Republican, in defense of a new state law that prohibits the government from forcing state residents to buy health insurance.
Mr. Cuccinelli argued that while the government can regulate economic activity that substantially affects interstate commerce, the decision not to buy insurance amounts to economic inactivity that is beyond the government’s reach.
“This won’t be the final round, as this will ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court, but today is a critical milestone in the protection of the Constitution,” Mr. Cuccinelli said in a statement after the ruling.
Administration officials told reporters last week that a negative ruling would have virtually no impact on the law’s implementation, noting that its two major provisions — the coverage mandate and the creation of new insurance markets — don’t take effect until 2014.
By Rand Paul
Obama acts as though we no longer have a Constitution
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.
Challenge the political status quo. Realize that you make better decisions than the bureaucrats in D.C.?
A politically conservative and morally liberal Hebrew alpha male hunts left-wing viper
Sometimes life requires a paradigm twist.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention
California wildfires wreak havoc