- Air Force cadets ‘revolt’ after officials remove biblical verse from whiteboard
- Rep. Lee: Paul Ryan out of touch with urban Americans
- House votes down resolution to force Issa to apologize
- Kremlin blocks opposition websites; Kasparov fears Putin plans ‘something drastic’
- Saving trees? EPA wastes $1.5 million storing unneeded pamphlets in warehouse
- Scott Brown Senate bid in New Hampshire may launch soon
- Jeffrey Corzine, son of ex-N.J. governor, dead at 31
- Australian surfing magazine sorry for calling indigenous surfer ‘apeish’
- Records: Man in Fla. theater shooting also was texting
- The Putin problem: U.S. needs Russian rockets for spy satellites
Senate votes to begin debate on START
Barbs fly amid last-minute rush
The Senate voted Wednesday to begin debating a nuclear arms reduction treaty with Russia in a test vote that signals the treaty — which would cut the number of nuclear weapons that the U.S. and Russia have deployed —has enough support to be ratified.
The 66-32 vote on the so-called New START, and an earlier 81-19 vote in favor of a broad tax-cut package, marked a rare outbreak of bipartisanship at a time when tempers ran high and time ran short on the 111th Congress.
Things got so heated that lawmakers exchanged barbs on who best understood the meaning of Christmas. Republicans complained that Democrats were forcing the schedule perilously close to the Christian holiday.
“I do not need to hear the sanctimonious lectures of Sens. Kyl and DeMint to remind me of what Christmas means,” shot back Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, the Nevada Democrat who has packed the last-minute schedule full of controversial issues and has threatened to keep lawmakers working to the very last day. He was referring to Republican Sens. Jon Kyl of Arizona and Jim DeMint of South Carolina.
In retaliation for the loaded calendar, several Republican senators have said they will insist that the clerk read the entire 1,924-page spending bill Democrats unveiled just this week - a move that could block the floor for days. The GOP says Democrats are overplaying their hand in a lame-duck session by trying to jam the spending through Congress.
But at least for one day, bipartisan coalitions made progress on big issues, including the arms-reduction treaty that President Obama desperately wants to see ratified as a year-end foreign-policy coup.
The 66 votes to begin debate on the treaty show backers are just one shy of the 67 needed to secure ratification, and Sen. Evan Bayh, Indiana Democrat, who was absent for Wednesday’s vote, is expected to support the treaty. In addition, several Republicans who voted against starting debate said they still could support final ratification.
“We have the opportunity not only to demonstrate our leadership to the world; we have the opportunity to demonstrate our leadership to the American people,” said Sen. John Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat and chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
But some Republicans said they read the treaty’s preamble to control U.S. missile-defense decisions.
Republicans also said they fear Russia will cheat and that the treaty’s verification requirements are too weak. They said the classified information pertaining the treaty should be read by all senators before a vote.
“I don’t know how many of you have seen former [Russian Prime Minister Vladimir] Putin singing ‘Blueberry Hill’ on the news, and I don’t know if you’ve looked in his eyes and found trust and confidence or not. But I’m not ready to go there,” said Sen. Pat Roberts, Kansas Republican. “As a matter of fact, I think I would probably sing back a country-western song saying the bridge of trust and verification is washed out, I can’t swim, and the treaty’s on the other side.”
The GOP said there’s not enough time to consider the treaty and debate amendments this year.
Sen. Lamar Alexander, a Tennessee Republican who voted against beginning the debate Wednesday, said he would support the treaty if lawmakers had enough time to properly consider the measure.
“There’s been plenty of time to do these issues. Yet we have a lame-duck session where the majority seems to be insisting on an encore, where there were boos for the concert,” he said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Senators deluged by complaints void 2-year-old flood insurance plan before 10-day break
- Obama calls for 'more humane' deportation policy
- Senators reach deal on unemployment benefits
- Boehner invites Pope Francis to address Congress
- Harry Reid: 'I'm not afraid of the Koch brothers'
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Bob Dole
The industrious island has proved itself worthy of U.S. inclusion
- F-35 secrets now showing up in Chinas stealth fighter
- EXCLUSIVE: FBI blocked in corruption probe involving Sens. Reid, Lee
- USS Kidd sent to Indian Ocean after 'indication' of Malaysian jet crash
- Oil rig worker says he saw missing plane go down: report
- College group's diversity event canceled after excluding white people
- Warren Buffett's son to spend $23.7 million in effort to save South African rhinos
- Justice Department refuses info on hundreds of prosecutor misconduct cases
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- PRUDEN: Sink sank own campaign in Florida special election
Chaos as Manhattan building explodes
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again