Acknowledging they were breaking new ground, deeply divided House lawmakers voted Thursday to censure Rep. Charles B. Rangel for breaking tax laws and House rules, saying Congress needed to live up to Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s pledge to be open, honest and ethical.
Mrs. Pelosi herself publicly read the censure to the New York Democrat as the 20-term veteran stood before her in the well of the House, becoming just the 23rd member to be censured in House history, and the first person in 27 years.
Among the charges against him were failing to declare rental income on a vacation home in the Dominican Republic and violating the House’s solicitation and gift ban.
Mixing sorrow and defiance, Mr. Rangel, a Korean War veteran who is much-beloved by his colleagues, told them he had erred. But he also said the censure was “political” and said he thought the House was unfairly trying to teach lawmakers a lesson by making an example of him.
“I know in my heart I’m not going to be judged by this Congress. But I’m going to be judged by my life, my activities, my contributions to society,” Mr. Rangel said afterward, drawing applause from some fellow Democrats, particularly members of the Congressional Black Caucus.
The vote was 333-79 to impose the censure, which carries a severe stigma though no other official loss of privileges.
But the key vote came minutes earlier when a more narrowly divided House voted 267-146 against instead imposing the lesser penalty of a reprimand. Mr. Rangel’s support came heavily, though not exclusively, from fellow black lawmakers and liberal Democrats. Three Republicans also voted for a reprimand.
But on Thursday lawmakers disagreed over how serious the violations were. His backers said he was “sloppy” and “overzealous” but not corrupt or criminal, while those who pushed for censure said the pattern of behavior - his violations ranged from misuse of his office to failing to report taxes - argued for the more severe penalty.
The ethics committee’s investigative report, which ran to 5,000 pages, said Mr. Rangel solicited donations using official letterhead from people who had business before the Ways and Means Committee during the time he was the chairman or the ranking Democrat on the panel.
During the hour-long floor debate Mr. Rangel apologized for putting his colleagues in the “awkward position” of sitting in judgment of him, and said he was taking responsibility for his actions. But he said censure was unfair, based on history.
While early censures were issued for insults or inappropriate language in the House, in recent years the penalty has been issued for sexual misconduct with a House page, payroll fraud and improper use of campaign funds.
Transgressions by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former Majority Leader Tom DeLay instead drew a reprimand or the even lighter punishment of an admonishment.View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
By Douglas Holtz-Eakin
The young drop coverage to avoid higher premiums
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
Join the Communities and submit your column in response to one written, or on something totally new and unique. We want to hear from you
An advocate against sexual trafficking and for victims, Holly Smith speaks out.
Health care reform, organized medicine, physician practice management, and patient care--a real time look at the challenges facing doctors and patients in America today.
First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention
California wildfires wreak havoc