- Kim Jong-un’s uncle removed from North Korean state documentary
- Thailand crisis deepens as opposition quits Parliament
- Campbell Soup apologizes for SpaghettiOs’ Pearl Harbor tweet
- Former Reagan aide James Baker: President regretted apartheid veto
- Some donations to gay waitress who allegedly forged hate note refunded
- German President Joachim Gauck boycotting Sochi Olympics
- Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel: If you want to pay more for your doctor, you can under Obamacare
- Sen. Rand Paul: ‘I am seriously thinking about’ running for president in 2016
- Sleet, ice, deepfreeze hit large swath of U.S.
- ‘Welcome to the edge of freedom’: Biden’s boots touch down in DMZ
SIMMONS: Private gallery right for ‘Hide’
Score another one for Christianity. How else to definitively assess what happened at the Smithsonian Institution's National Portrait Gallery?
A little background for those of you who are not in the know. Over Halloween weekend, the renowned gallery in downtown Washington opened a privately financed exhibit titled "Hide/Seek: Difference and Desire in American Portraiture" that featured a video by the late artist David Wojnarowicz.
The video, "A Fire in the Belly," includes scenes of ants crawling about the crucified body of Jesus Christ.
To be honest, I have neither seen the exhibit nor watched the 30-minute video in its entirety. But I did get the picture while watching a TV news program, and even then, I didn't particularly care to view any public or private "work of art" that makes such a despicable depiction.
After protestations from Americans who called the "art" sacrilegious, the gallery announced Tuesday that it had pulled the video, which, not surprisingly, had found a new home at a private gallery in Northwest Washington.
That is as it should be.
Martin Sullivan, director of the National Portrait Gallery, tried to explain the intentions of Wojnarowicz, who died of AIDS in 1992.
"I regret that some reports about the exhibit have created an impression that the video is intentionally sacrilegious," Mr. Sullivan said in a press release. "In fact, the artist's intention was to depict the suffering of an AIDS victim. It was not the museum's intention to offend. We have removed the video."
Mr. Sullivan encouraged visitors to visit the exhibit online or at the gallery, but he also discouraged the voice of the public by directing comments to a P.O. box. Who has time these days to write letters, which can be tossed accidentally into the you-know-what with no record of ever having been received? E-mail would be easier (firstname.lastname@example.org) and would leave a time stamp. Some people might prefer to call (202/633-1000).
The National Portrait Gallery is a public museum funded with public dollars and sees an estimated 1 million pairs of feet passing through its doorways every year. Congress mustn't lose sight of that.
While somebody else's money paid for "Hide/Seek," the gallery's caretakers are beholden to the greenbacks appropriated on Capitol Hill.
Don't play hide-and-seek with our money.
Things could have been as Mr. Sullivan described them. Could be the museum didn't intend to offend. But that begs the question: Did the museum's officials and curators intend to glorify homosexuality?
And if not that question, then another.
Why, in heaven's name, is the National Portrait Gallery - get it? "portrait" - exhibiting works that depict Christ being defiled by ants? Didn't He suffer enough?
"A Fire in the Belly" is right where it should be, and if it travels the land, it should make the rounds of private boutiques and galleries in San Francisco, Soho and the like or elsewhere, as long as it doesn't land in any - any - forum that suckles tax dollars.
Some of the passers-by interviewed on TV said the video should open up discussions. But discussions about what? HIV/AIDS?
How can we openly discuss the disease and its deadly consequences when people who have the virus are considered "victims." People with diabetes or heart disease, prostate or breast cancer or measles or mumps, Tay-Sachs or sickle cell anemia aren't considered victims.
That Mr. Sullivan had to explain the artist's intentions suggests the museum's curatorial process lacks traditional cultural sensibilities or, worse, that those sensibilities were ignored.
In the end, officials at the National Portrait Gallery did the right thing. But let the "Hide/Seek" controversy serve as a cultural wake-up call to the Smithsonian and other public-private cultural projects: The devil is in the details.
- Deborah Simmons can be reached at email@example.com.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Award-winning opinion writer Deborah Simmons is a senior correspondent who reports on City Hall and writes about education, culture, sports and family-related topics. Mrs. Simmons has worked at several newspapers, and since joining The Washington Times in 1985, has served as editorial-page editor and features editor and on the metro desk. She has taught copy editing at the University of ...
- SIMMONS: Obama visits Southeast D.C. with minimum wage on his mind
- SIMMONS: Mayor Gray has only himself to outrun in campaign
- SIMMONS: Jack Kent Cooke's legacy continues to produce winners
- SIMMONS: Thanksgiving is about much more than gobble, gobble
- SIMMONS: Effects of raising D.C.'s minimum wage are murky
Latest Blog Entries
- Obama: Hole U.S. 'digging out of' requires billions more in unemployment benefits
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Sen. Richard Durbin: No line in the sand on unemployment benefits
- Dick Cheney: Family feud over gay marriage has been 'dealt with'
- Sen. Rand Paul: Supreme Court needs to re-examine Fourth Amendment
- Sen. Rand Paul: 'I am seriously thinking about' running for president in 2016
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality
- Rep. Mike McCaul: 'Al Qaeda's on the run' is 'false narrative'
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. and beyond.
Get in the middle of all the action inside and outside the boxing ring.
Opinion, analysis, and musings on politics, pop culture, reinvention, and the resultant flotsam and jetsam floating around the right-of-center quadrant of the Left Coast.
Let it snow
White House pets gone wild!