- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
- ISTOOK: IRS “wants to throw us in jail,” says tea party leader
- Easter woes: Chocolate costs soar, becoming ‘unaffordable’ luxury
Neutrality on Net, but not in sphere of politics
FCC rules set off wide fury
Setting the stage for a likely court battle and a showdown with Republicans in the new Congress, a sharply divided Federal Communications Commission on Tuesday approved sweeping Internet regulations designed to promote “net neutrality” and deliver on a key campaign promise of President Obama.
In a 3-2 vote split along party lines, the FCC board approved Chairman Julius Genachowski’s plan to establish enforceable rules of the road for the Web, with regulations that prohibit phone and cable companies from favoring or discriminating against Internet content and services, including those from its commercial rivals.
The panel’s three Democratic appointees supported the measure, while the two GOP nominees were opposed.
The vote drew fire from all sides. Republican congressional leaders called the move a federal power grab and vowed to take the FCC to task when the 112th Congress convenes. Supporters of net neutrality said the regulations were “watered down” and “loophole-ridden.”
The rules were created with input from telecommunications giants such as AT&T.
Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas, the ranking Republican on the Senate Commerce Committee, said she plans to introduce a “resolution of disapproval” to try to overturn what she called “troubling regulatory overreach by the FCC.”
House Republicans, who take control of the chamber in January, vowed that hearings on a proposed repeal of the FCC’s action will be at the very top of the agenda, according to incoming House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Fred Upton, Michigan Republican.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, compared the FCC action to what he said were other examples of government overreach by the Obama administration.
“The Obama administration, which has already nationalized health care, the auto industry, insurance companies, banks and student loans, will move forward with what could be a first step in controlling how Americans use the Internet by establishing federal regulations on its use,” he said. “This would harm investment, stifle innovation and lead to job losses.”
Shrugging off criticism from allies and opponents, Mr. Obama hailed the vote in a statement released by the White House.
“As technology and the market continue to evolve at a rapid pace, my administration will remain vigilant and see to it that innovation is allowed to flourish, that consumers are protected from abuse, and that the democratic spirit of the Internet remains intact,” the president said.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat, also issued a statement praising the FCC move.
While at times arcane, the net neutrality debate at heart is about who will write and enforce the rules of the road for the information superhighway.
Consumer groups and Internet-based businesses such as Netflix have complained that telecommunications giants slow or block access for heavy users from competitive sites to give their own movie and entertainment sites a competitive advantage. But major telecommunications firms such as AT&T, Comcast and Verizon counter that they cannot justify huge investments in Internet infrastructure if they must offer access to all comers on basically the same terms.
Many conservative and libertarian critics also see the FCC move as a stalking horse for greater government control of content on the Web and the potential of silencing dissent. They also say the administration is pre-empting congressional action by proposing a solution where no problem exists.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Eldridge joined The Washington Times in 1999 and over the next seven years helped lead the paper’s coverage of regional politics and government, Sept. 11, and the sniper attacks of 2002. In 2006, he was named managing editor of the paper’s website. He came to The Times from the Telegraph in North Platte, Neb., where he served as executive ...
- Silver: GOP has 60% chance to retake Senate
- Country Times: As all-timers go, Cash remains The Man (In Black)
- COUNTRY TIMES: Is Taylor's relationship with Nashville coming to a Swift end?
- COUNTRY TIMES: Nashville's collaboration with Doobie Brothers a natural partnership
- COUNTRY TIMES: Dierks Bentley is here to save country music
Latest Blog Entries
- Mainers would rather move to Canada than down South
- McCain: 'Stand your ground' laws may need review
- Sen. Tom Coburn: Holder investigating himself is a 'total conflict of interest'
- CNN poll: IRS, AP and Benghazi haven't dinged Obama's approval rating
- Slain diplomat's mom on Obama's Benghazi comments: 'Bullfeathers'
TWT Video Picks
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
- Immigration still on hold: Boehner's office
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
- PRUDEN: When a bored president just 'mails it in'
- Nancy Pelosi washes immigrants' feet in humble Holy Week act then promotes on Twitter
- Atheists rush to stage Easter display: 'Jesus Christ is a myth'
- BRUCE: Obama deliberately emboldening America's enemies
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Critics rail against liberal bias for commencement speakers
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.