- Putin tells Merkel that Ukraine is on the brink of civil war
- San Antonio mayor to Obama: Give amnesty to illegals with legal families
- NYPD disbands unit that spied on Muslims to go after ‘real bad guys’
- Donald Rumsfeld has ‘no idea’ if he paid taxes correctly
- Bradley Manning named honorary grand marshal of San Francisco Pride parade
- Look out PayPal: Facebook working toward mobile payments system
- U.S. rebukes Iran’s U.N. envoy pick over 1979 embassy attack
- Stoned mom avoids jail after driving 12 miles with baby on roof
- More than 100 ‘inappropriate’ encounters between NYC school staffers, students since 2009: report
- Joe Biden to Boston bombing survivors: ‘America will never, ever stand down’
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Stop nuclear umbrella holes before START
Adm. James Lyons in his article “Halt START negotiations” (Commentary, Monday) summarized many of the issues that should concern the current administration with respect to nuclear policy. He suggested that these issues provide a reason for delaying or stopping the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty negotiations, now on a fast track with Russia.
While it is clear that short-term concerns with negotiations for a new START agreement with Russia are driving policy, it is foolhardy to conclude such a treaty before the administration receives the much-anticipated Nuclear Posture Review. The United States has too many issues on hold while awaiting the NPR to even consider making agreements with Russia now. The issues of concern are as follows:
(1) Russia has embarked on an aggressive modernization program for nuclear warheads and delivery vehicles.
(2) The United States is the only one of the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council not making provisions for upgrading their nuclear capability.
(3) Secretary of defense Robert Gates and director of Los Alamos Michael Anastasio have both acknowledged that warheads in the stockpile are subject to material changes that limit weapon lifetimes. Having been responsible in the past for Britain’s nuclear stockpile management, I know first-hand about such problems.
(4) It is so long since we have had an active nuclear weapon program that our capability to reconstitute one has been seriously degraded.
(5) Proliferation of warhead and missile capabilities continues unabated. This means that we still must retain our deterrent posture, if indeed some emerging nations and terrorist groups can be deterred, while also enhancing our missile and other defenses.
(6) It is unsurprising that Russia has advocated a limitation on missile defenses in the START talks.
(7) Our current administration has yet to recognize how these problems are inter-related. Continuing to ignore these major issues places us - and our many allies that still shelter under the umbrella of America’s extended deterrent - at increasing risk.
Let us hope that some rays of sunshine will penetrate the gloom that presently pervades the lack of a comprehensive nuclear policy in the Obama White House.
TWT Video Picks
By returning to goodness, the nation can achieve greatness once again
Get Breaking Alerts
- Fuel-filled wings, ability to swarm: Pentagon offers glimpse at future of drone fleet
- Secret U.S. assessments show Afghanistan not ready to govern on own
- U.S. military on high alert as Ukraine troops trade gunfire with pro-Russian militants
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- GOP writes legislation to deny Attorney General Eric Holder his salary
- Al Qaeda mocks U.S. in 'extraordinary' Yemen gathering; experts fear CIA caught flat-footed
- HHS nominee Sylvia Burwell entangled in MetLife lawsuit
- Russian fighter jet buzzes U.S. Navy destroyer in Black Sea
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
- Bill Clinton falls off vegan diet wagon but not vegan label
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Solution to Cyprus dispute is no 'mistake'
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama's real wealth redistribution scheme
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obamacare numbers nothing to celebrate
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Unanswered bus-crash questions
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Lerner won't face meaningful punishment