FEULNER: Jobs we all pay for

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

Americans often wonder where all our tax money goes. Well, a good chunk finances a steadily growing government work force. State and local governments spent $1.1 trillion on employee wages and benefits in 2008. That’s half of what those governments spent overall.

Also, while the private-sector job market remains bleak, there are more civil service jobs than ever. The U.S. Labor Department projects wage and salary employment in state and local governments will increase 8 percent by 2018. That’s a comforting thought for anyone who has to spend time in line at the Department of Motor Vehicles. Wish we could be as confident about the prospects for creating new corporate and manufacturing jobs to help pay for these new hires.

It’s not simply the number of new jobs that costs taxpayers. It’s that these government jobs pay more than ever. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that state and local government workers earn almost $40 per hour in wages, salaries and benefits. That’s more than 25 percent higher than the combined compensation of the average private-sector job ($27 per hour).

Public-sector employees have more paid leave and receive more than twice the health insurance benefits of private-sector employees. And government employees are famously more secure.

While the overall job market has been churning in recent years, destroying more jobs than it has created, public-sector workers seldom are cut for any reason. Meanwhile, the number of government employees who voluntarily resign is one-third the rate of the private sector. “That suggests that state and local pay is higher than needed to attract qualified workers,” notes Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute.

None of this seemed like much of a concern during good economic times. The growing economy of the mid-2000s generally brought higher tax revenues, providing more money for states and localities.

The recession ended that. Most states have seen tax revenues decline. Because states are required to maintain balanced budgets (a discipline the federal government routinely ignores), they’ve been struggling to make ends meet. A good chunk of last year’s federal stimulus spending went to states to keep civil servants on the payroll.

However, as Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels warned in the Wall Street Journal in September, “state governments will soon have to choose between a major downsizing or consigning themselves to permanent decline.”

There’s a bigger problem. Lord Keynes famously said, “In the long run, we’re all dead.” Before they die, though, millions of retired state and local bureaucrats will drain trillions of dollars from taxpayers.

A report by Robert Novy-Marx and Joshua D. Rauh found that government pension funds are unfunded by about $3.2 trillion. That’s an extra $27,000 that each American household will need to pony up in the decades ahead.

The price tag is so large because more than 80 percent of government workers are still eligible for old- fashioned defined-benefit retirement programs. State and local governments are making massive spending promises, and taxpayers will have to pick up the tab. By contrast, such pension funds are available to just 20 percent of private-sector workers.

Civil service workers are also a throwback because they’re heavily unionized. Last year, about 7.9 million public-sector employees were in a union, while just 7.4 million private-sector workers were. More than a third of government workers pay union dues, while just 7 percent of the rest of the work force is unionized.

Dan Henninger of the Wall Street Journal writes that the unionization of government workers dates to a 1962 executive order issued by President Kennedy. As a cost-saving measure, President Obama could lift that order because government employees still would enjoy the protection of civil service laws and greater job security than most private-sector workers.

It’s time governments took control of their payrolls. After all, we’ll all be paying for these decisions for decades to come.

Ed Feulner is president of the Heritage Foundation.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts