- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
- ‘Duck Dynasty’ Phil Robertson suspended ‘indefinitely’ for gay quip
- John Podesta eats crow: ‘I apologize to Speaker Boehner’
TYRRELL: Hamid Karzai, Chicago Democrat
Question of the Day
I am beginning to think of President Hamid Karzai as Hamid Karzai, Afghanistan Democrat. The way he inveighs against troops who are fighting to secure his government in that inhospitable realm sounds very much like Sen. Richard J. Durbin, Illinois Democrat, inveighing against our troops during the George W. Bush administration. Not only that, but now Mr. Karzai has arrogated for himself a formerly independent Afghan commission whose duty it was to monitor elections for fraud and other irregularities. Last week he signed a decree that henceforth will allow him rather than the United Nations to appoint officials to the Electoral Complaints Commission, which the United Nations set up in the aftermath of Mr. Karzai’s rigged re-election. So maybe it would be more appropriate for me to think of him as Hamid Karzai, Chicago Democrat.
We now have under way in Afghanistan the most massive military operation since autumn 2001, when our forces sent the Taliban fleeing to their caves and mountain refuges. Thousands of American, British and Afghan troops have overrun the former Taliban stronghold of Marjah. There they are trying to establish a proper civilian government while capturing or killing a sufficient number of Taliban to persuade the rest to lay down their arms. Yet on at least two occasions, civilians have been killed. This was not because our troops were reckless or insensitive to the plight of civilians. A major goal of our forces is to minimize civilian casualties so as to win, as they say, the hearts and minds of the Afghans. So strict are the rules of engagement that they have increased the risk of injuries and fatalities to our forces.
Yet still civilians have been wounded and killed - not exactly by accident. A little-remarked fact of war against Islamic fundamentalists is that they use civilians (Muslims) as shields. They even use holy places such as mosques as shields for stationing their troops and storing their weapons. This use of civilians as shields takes place in the Palestinian territories, where the death of civilians is used as propaganda against the Israel Defense Forces, and of course in Iraq and Afghanistan, where the death of innocents is seen as a propaganda triumph against us.
Islamic fundamentalists not only use civilians as shields, they target them with roadside bombs and - even grislier - with suicide bombers attacking bazaars and cafes. The strategic purpose is create dissension and demoralization among the citizenry. People familiar with warfare against Islamic fundamentalists know this. Surely Mr. Karzai, Chicago Democrat, knows this. He also knows that our air strikes are nixed if our monitors perceive civilians in a targeted area. Likewise, our soldiers hold their fire when the enemy is using civilians - often women and children - as shields while they travel through the country, planting bombs and planning ambushes. Nonetheless he assists them in spreading the propaganda that we are responsible for civilian deaths.
Over the weekend, he opened the Afghan Parliament with a diatribe. It was not against the Taliban who are in insurrection against his government, but against our troops, who are training his army, pursuing the Taliban and trying to hand over a secure Afghanistan to him. He brought along a picture of a young Afghan girl who lost her family during a mid-February strike by our forces against suspected Taliban. That is a bit of public relations wizardry, but at the expense of his protectors and on behalf of his enemies. His protectors, led by Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, have apologized for their involvement in civilian deaths. His enemies, who have put the civilians in harm’s way, apologize for nothing.
Reviewing his presidency, its corruption, ineptitude and arrant stupidity, I am convinced of the aptness of thinking of President Hamid Karzai as Hamid Karzai, Chicago Democrat. Perhaps this year, the Democrats will ask him to speak at one of their Jackson Day Dinners.
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. is the founder and editor in chief of the American Spectator and an adjunct scholar at the Hudson Institute.
About the Author
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
Get Breaking Alerts
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Half of America strips religion from Christmas
- In court filing, NCAA denies legal duty to protect athletes
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- NAPOLITANO: NSA spies pick up interference from the Constitution
- John McCain to Harry Reid: Ill kick the crap out of you