- Jimmy Carter: Don’t hurt Russian people with sanctions
- Oldest ex-MLB player dies in Cuba, 2 days shy of 103rd birthday
- ‘Top Gun’ for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy’s approval
- Bill Clinton to endorse Charlie Rangel for re-election
- Pfc. Bradley Manning is now Pfc. Chelsea Manning: Court says so
- Secret base U.S. special forces used to train Libyans now under terrorist control: report
- 9th suspect in N.C. kidnapping turns self in to FBI
- L.A. sheriff admits to testing flyover spy program without notifying residents
- Foreign minister vows response if Russians are attacked in Ukraine
- Robert Griffin III to drive pace car before Richmond NASCAR race
Obama critics seek to restore budget cuts
Even as they faulted President Obama for not cutting deeply enough in the budget he sent to Congress this week, Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill laid the groundwork Tuesday for all-out fights to try to add back more spending on defense and domestic priorities — and the administration already is warning of vetoes if some lines are crossed.
Republicans said Mr. Obama’s proposed cuts to the C-17 transport aircraft and last year’s decision to end the F-22 Raptor will have to be revisited in light of new threats and unmet defense needs. Democrats said the budget freezes out public works projects and breaks faith with those who are counting on federal assistance, such as farmers.
“I see a budget that puts a bull’s-eye on many policies that rural America relies on,” said Sen. Blanche Lincoln, Arkansas Democrat and chairman of the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee, who is in a difficult re-election campaign.
Overall, it was a rough start for the president’s $3.83 trillion blueprint for fiscal 2011, which he submitted Monday. As his deputies descended on Capitol Hill to testify before several committees, they found themselves fending off charges that they went too far, that they didn’t go far enough, and that their cuts were too blunt.
Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, North Dakota Democrat, said he credits the administration with staving off a global economic collapse last year, but he was expecting Mr. Obama to show more leadership in this budget to rein in long-term costs.
“I don’t see the focus. I don’t see the pivot,” he told Peter Orszag, the White House budget director.
Mr. Orszag said the budget includes more than $1 trillion in total deficit reductions over the next 10 years, which he said represented the largest cuts a president has submitted in more than a decade.
But he acknowledged that the budget doesn’t live up to the administration’s standards, laid out last year, for what constitutes a sustainable course.
“Is it enough? No, we’ve admitted that,” Mr. Orszag said.
It became clear just how much stock the White House is putting in Mr. Obama’s plan to create a debt commission to try to bridge that gap.
Mr. Orszag said the administration is counting on a commission “to get us the rest of the way” to sustainable spending, and to force Republicans to shoulder responsibility with Democrats for doing that.
“This has to be done on a bipartisan basis, and we are calling for a commission, and with the goal of not only addressing our long-term fiscal imbalance but also balancing the budget excluding interest payments on the debt by 2015, which would get us the rest of the way there to our fiscal target,” he said.
Mr. Obama’s plan is to create a bipartisan commission that could propose both savings and tax increases, and would compile the best ideas offered.
So far, the only broad proposal has come from Rep. Paul Ryan, Wisconsin Republican, who last month released a “road map” for budget cuts and overhauling entitlement programs, and who has sparked a real debate in the House.
His plan would change the way tax law handles health insurance to make Americans take more control of their plans, and would rewrite Social Security and Medicare for those younger than 55. On Medicare, future retirees would be given a set dollar amount to purchase Medicare-approved plans, and on Social Security, future retirees could elect to invest some of their payroll taxes in personal retirement accounts.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- No comment on petition to deport Bieber
- Red-state Democrats blast latest Keystone delay
- 'Deport Bieber' petition draws no comment from White House
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador's visa, but says law is 'advisory'
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Feds who send arms against ranch families betray American values
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- CARSON: When government looks more like foe than friend
- Pentagon plans to replace flight crews with 'full-time' robots
- Georgia governor signs bill expanding gun rights
- Texas is next! AG warns BLM wants 90,000 acres after Bundy ranch standoff
- Harry Reid using tax dollars to fight Koch brothers, La. GOP chair charges
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Opposition rising to Colorado gun control laws
- Ukraine claims torture by pro-Russian forces on the heels of Biden's stern warning to Moscow
- Professor apologizes after blasting Republicans in class
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Celebrity deaths in 2014