- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
- John Boehner says GOP should support gay candidates: ‘I do’
- Grass-Whopper: Pan-fried cricket burgers go over big in New York City
FEULNER: Tough call for tax help
Suppose you made 10 trips to the ATM, but it was out of order three of those times. Or that in 10 visits to a fast-food place, the milkshake machine was broken three times. Think you’d find a different bank and a better takeout restaurant?
The fact is, when dealing with customers, getting it right 70 percent of the time isn’t nearly good enough - unless, of course, you have the power of the U.S. government behind you.
As Americans begin thinking about tax season, the Internal Revenue Service promises that, this year, it will aim to answer 71 percent of the phone calls to its help-line number, 800/829-1040. So the agency begins the tax season by admitting it plans to ignore three out of every 10 callers.
This actually would be a slight improvement from 2008, when just five out of every 10 calls to the IRS were answered. And it would roughly equal last year’s “success rate,” when seven out of 10 calls were answered.
Meanwhile, those who manage to get their call answered must endure the waiting game. The average caller will spend 12 minutes on hold.
“This level of service is unacceptable,” National Taxpayer Advocate Nina E. Olson said. She called the IRS’ unresponsiveness the “No. 1 most serious problem for taxpayers.” (Wonder if she’s ever been audited?)
In the agency’s defense, spokeswoman Michelle Eldridge told The Washington Post, “The bottom line is we have answered millions more phone calls in the last two years than ever before.” That’s undoubtedly true. Year after year, Congress makes changes to the tax code, making it even more difficult to understand. That’s why most taxpayers pay someone else to prepare their returns; they’re afraid to make an expensive mistake.
They’re right to worry. Even if they can get through to the IRS for help, taxpayers often are steered wrong.
For example, a 2004 Treasury report found that the IRS provided incorrect answers 20 percent of the time. In the agency’s defense, that may be because often there isn’t one single, apparent, correct answer. For many years, Money magazine asked 50 tax professionals to prepare sample returns. Year after year, the pros came up with different tax liabilities - sometimes differing from each other by as much as $1,000.
Even when IRS advice isn’t wrong, it’s often misleading.
Last year, the Treasury Department studied the IRS program that provides volunteer tax preparers to those who ask for help. About 41 percent of returns were filled out incorrectly. “If 17 of the incorrectly prepared tax returns had been filed, taxpayers would not have received $4,138 in tax refunds to which they were entitled,” the Treasury study found. Quite a price to pay for free help.
The real problem is that lawmakers keep trying to use the tax code to shape social policy. They then compound the mistake by ramping up the IRS workload without providing additional resources to do the work.
Congress gives tax breaks to induce people to save for retirement - but caps those breaks so people won’t save “too much.” It aims to encourage oil production - but in trying to discourage energy tax shelters, lawmakers thwart most of the incentives.
It gives tax breaks for installing a particular type of window in your home. It gives a tax credit for each child, but beware: The amount of that credit will plunge next year unless lawmakers act this year.
Enough. The purpose of a tax code is to collect revenue to fund the federal government. And that’s all it should be used for. In 1986, lawmakers greatly simplified the tax code, but we’ve allowed it to get out of hand again in the decades since. It’s time for a flat tax that we can all understand and with which we can all comply.
About the Author
Get Breaking Alerts
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- MILLER: Obamacare enrollees include 101 members of the House of Representatives
- Obama administration issues permits for wind farms to kill more eagles
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Obama downplays IRS scandal, blames Obamacare rollout on 'outdated' agencies
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality