LETTER TO THE EDITOR: MacArthur, McChrystal firings dissimilar

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

I’m sorry to say that initial enthusiasm turned to disappointment as I read the Thursday Commentary column by John C. Waugh, “McClellan and McChrystal.” I had been waiting for someone to use the Abraham Lincoln comparison with regard to Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal’s firing, but I don’t agree with the one Mr. Waugh used.

As a self-proclaimed Civil War buff, I believe it is fallacious to compare the incidents involving Gen. McChrystal and Gen. Douglas MacArthur. MacArthur argued against President Truman’s policy, not his person. Gen. McChrystal personally and publicly insulted the president and his administration. This was, of course, foolish and a proper basis for being relieved - but it did not “undermine civilian control of the military.” At no time did Gen. McChrystal advocate disobeying the orders of the president.

Closer analogies between Lincoln and President Obama are the following two incidents (using David Donald’s “Lincoln” as a reference): On the night of Nov. 13, 1861, Lincoln waited at McClellan’s home for an hour for his return. When he did come home, McClellan ignored the president and went upstairs. After another hour, the president was told that McClellan had gone to bed. Lincoln expressed the view that “it was better at this time not to be making points of etiquette and personal dignity” and said that he was willing to hold McClellan’s horse if he would win a victory.

In appointing “Fighting Joe” Hooker to command the Army of the Potomac, Lincoln told him, “[T]here are some things in regard to which I am not quite satisfied with you,” and mentioned his “recently saying that both the Army and the Government needed a Dictator. … Of course, it was not for this, but in spite of it, that I have given you command. Only those generals who gain success can set up dictators. What I now ask of you is military success and I will risk the dictatorship.”

This singleness of purpose made Lincoln a great president. He put success in battle above personal feelings.

If Gen. David H. Petraeus were to become incapacitated, would Mr. Obama reinstate Gen. McChrystal as commander in Afghanistan? I hope that he would, like Lincoln, put the interest of the war above personal feelings.


© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts