COLUMBIA, S.C. | South Carolina’s state police should investigate how the unemployed winner of the state’s Democratic U.S. Senate primary paid his filing fee of more than $10,000, after claiming indigency and being appointed a public defender to represent him in a court case, a state lawmaker says.
“There are several questions regarding the filing fee paid for by Mr. Alvin Greene,” Republican Rep. Chip Limehouse wrote in a letter dated Tuesday to State Law Enforcement Division Chief Reggie Lloyd.
Mr. Greene, a 32-year-old political unknown, stunned the party establishment when he defeated former state lawmaker Vic Rawl in the June 8 primary to see who would face GOP U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint, the heavy favorite in the fall.
Mr. Greene was arrested in November and charged with showing obscene Internet photos to a University of South Carolina student, then talking about going to her room at a university dorm. He has declined to comment on the charge, has yet to enter a plea or be indicted and says he’s staying in the race.
But Mr. Greene, who filed court paperwork stating his only income amounted to about $1,160 a month, said he couldn’t afford an attorney and was appointed one by the court. Mr. Greene did not indicate where that income came from. In his letter, Mr. Limehouse says Mr. Greene may owe the government money if it’s proven he didn’t need a publicly paid lawyer.
SLED spokeswoman Jennifer Timmons said the agency was reviewing the request.
Mr. Greene has said he saved up for two years to pay the $10,440 candidate fee.
Mr. Limehouse’s is the latest in a string of inquiries into Mr. Greene and his candidacy. State Democratic Party Chairwoman Carol Fowler on June 9 asked Mr. Greene to withdraw after the Associated Press reported his felony charge. Days later, U.S. Rep. James E. Clyburn, South Carolina Democrat, called on state and federal authorities to probe whether Mr. Greene was a plant for forces seeking to discredit South Carolina’s Democrats.
Mr. Rawl has asked the state Democratic Party for a new primary election based on flaws with the voting machines or software, citing voting irregularities, including people who tried to vote for Mr. Rawl but whose ballots showed Mr. Greene’s name checked instead.
Brett Bursey, a liberal activist in South Carolina, has also asked a federal judge for a restraining order to keep elections officials from destroying data from machines used in the June 8 primary. Those machines will be reused during runoff elections on June 22, and Mr. Bursey says federal law requires states to maintain election records for nearly two years - including, he says, data from flashcards within the machines that record all voters’ keystrokes.
A federal judge was reviewing that request Wednesday, and the American Civil Liberties Union sent a letter to state election officials asking them to require county-level voting officials to preserve the data so it can be audited.
A spokesman for the State Election Commission said the data from the machines were checked routinely after every election, but no extra measures were being taken because of Mr. Rawl’s protest.
“We have no reason to believe that voting machines malfunctioned on June 8th or to doubt the accuracy the election results,” Chris Whitmire said.
By John Solomon
How the government's punishing of the exposure of official wrongdoing can linger for years
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.
A collection of reader guest articles, thoughts and opinions by Communities writers and breaking news and information.
Great discoveries in the world of restaurants and chefs fulfill the quest for delicious food and cooking.
Paul Rondeau dissects the propaganda, media tricks, and other shenanigans targeting our families, faith, and freedom…and even life itself
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention