- PHILLIPS: The benefits of defying ‘common wisdom’
- Judge strikes down Arkansas abortion law — nation’s toughest — as unconstitutional
- Court: Tenn. must recognize 3 same-sex marriages
- Russia claims to have downed U.S. drone over Crimea region; Pentagon denies
- John Daly shoots 90 at PGA Tour event: ‘I’m falling apart’
- Police: Man arrested in West Virginia may be linked to Alexandria killings
- Smile: Equipping cops with body-mounted cameras gains steam in Calif., N.Y.
- Obama to sign bill cutting taxpayer money for party conventions
- Half of Americans worried about second Cold War: poll
- Kermit Gosnell clinic aide who heard aborted baby scream gets 5 to 10 years in prison
G-20 leaders strike delicate balance
‘Violent agreement’ addresses cutting debt, aiding recovery
Leaders of the world’s 20 most powerful economies said this weekend that they must control deficits in the long run but not stifle a nascent economic recovery in the short term, in what President Obama described as “violent agreement” on principles.
And speaking to American reporters at the end of the Group of 20 summit in Toronto and after bilateral meetings with a half-dozen leaders, Mr. Obama said he and his allies share the same interest in standing up a successful government in Afghanistan.
Six months into his troop surge and several days after Mr. Obama replaced his top military commander in Afghanistan, the president said the going is rough but said the U.S. has “got a vital interest” in preventing a return to a pre-Sept. 11 situation in Afghanistan.
“This is going to be tough, but what I expect is that by the end of this year, we will have seen progress on the strategy that was laid out, we will conduct a full review, those things that are not working we will fix, those things that are working, we will build on,” he said.
He said the U.S. will have to provide assistance “for a long time to come.”
The G-20 summit followed the Group of Eight summit of the world’s eight largest economies on Friday and Saturday, also in Canada. The leaders here all agreed that the G-20 has now surpassed the G-8 as the premier international forum for cooperation on the economy and other multilateral challenges.
German officials’ strong warnings prompted Mr. Obama to note Sunday that German fiscal plans are actually about comparable to what Mr. Obama has already proposed for the U.S. in terms of pushing spending cuts to later years.
“If you actually look at their plans, they’re no more front-loaded than ours are,” Mr. Obama said.
The U.S. budget deficit hit a record $1.4 trillion in fiscal year 2009 and is expected to be near that in 2010, though the long-term budget Mr. Obama submitted to Congress in February showed the deficit dropping to about $727 billion in 2013 before rising again.
In the summit’s joint statement, the leaders left room for both points of view, though they did set targets for the advanced economies to cut their budget deficits in half by 2013.
“Strengthening the recovery is key. To sustain recovery, we need to follow through on delivering existing stimulus plans, while working to create the conditions for robust private demand,” the leaders said in their communique. “At the same time, recent events highlight the importance of sustainable public finances and the need for our countries to put in place credible, properly phased and growth-friendly plans to deliver fiscal sustainability, differentiated for and tailored to national circumstances.”
“After years of taking on too much debt, Americans cannot, and will not, borrow and buy the world’s way to lasting prosperity,” he said. “No nation should assume its path to prosperity is paved with exports to the United States.”
This weekend he also said he wants to take care of outstanding issues on the U.S.-South Korea free-trade agreement, signed in 2007, and have it finalized by the time he visits that country in November.
But that adds another contentious issue to an already full agenda, and is likely to further alienate parts of his political base who are wary of expanded free trade, particularly with the U.S. economy already so sluggish.
“It’s harder, it’s slower than I think anyone anticipated. But at the same time, we are seeing increasing violence,” Mr. Panetta said.
He said the Taliban is “engaged in greater violence” now than when Mr. Obama took office, and said they are stronger now in some ways, but weaker in other ways - including having some of their leadership killed or captured.
He also said that only between 50 and 100 members of al Qaeda remain in Afghanistan.
At his press conference in Toronto, Mr. Obama said that doesn’t mean the mission is accomplished and said the U.S. still has an interest in making sure Afghanistan doesn’t deteriorate back to a pre-Sept. 11 situation.
Some Democrats in Congress have urged the president to withdraw troops now, while others worry that his stated timetable of beginning to withdraw troops in July 2011 will slip. Top Republicans, meanwhile, argue that a withdrawal date is unwise.
Mr. Obama acknowledged that debate, but said his focus is on making sure his current strategy is successful.
But last week’s leadership change - he relieved Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal of command in Afghanistan and tapped Gen. David H. Petraeus to replace him - has left top lawmakers wondering whether the civilian leadership also needs reshuffling.
Speaking on the Sunday talk shows, Senate intelligence committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, California Democrat, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, South Carolina Republican and member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said this is likely Mr. Obama’s last chance to get the strategy in Afghanistan correct and that he must give Gen. Petraeus the latitude he needs.
“You put the general in; he should make the call. If he can’t work with the ambassador, the ambassador should be changed,” Mrs. Feinstein said on “Fox News Sunday.”
Gen. McChrystal and his staff had been critical of the civilian leadership, including Ambassador Karl W. Eikenberry and Richard C. Holbrooke, the State Department’s envoy to the region, who seem to have strained relationships with Afghan President Hamid Karzai.
“I think we put all our eggs in the Petraeus basket at this point,” Mrs. Feinstein said.
Other Democratic senators, though, said Mr. Obama has expressed confidence in the team he has now, including Mr. Holbrooke and Mr. Eikenberry.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- Clinton White House thought Hillary had secret to reaching Catholic voters
- Senators deluged by complaints void 2-year-old flood insurance plan before 10-day break
- Obama calls for 'more humane' deportation policy
- Senators reach deal on unemployment benefits
- Boehner invites Pope Francis to address Congress
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By David A. Clarke Jr.
Blame Washington's intelligence failure, not lack of police
- Russia claims to have downed U.S. drone over Crimea region; Pentagon denies
- EDITORIAL: Lois Lerner's dilemma
- EXCLUSIVE: FBI blocked in corruption probe involving Sens. Reid, Lee
- USS Kidd sent to Indian Ocean after 'indication' of Malaysian jet crash
- Bill Clinton struggled to address Islamic extremism: documents
- Trust me: Obama promises new overtime rules will be 'easier for everyone'
- Ukraine says Russian forces backed by helicopter gunships move outside Crimea
- College group's diversity event canceled after excluding white people
- Sam Adams beer brewer nixes St. Patrick's parade that won't allow gays
- HHS official resigns with scathing letter, rips 'dysfunctional' bureaucracy
Chaos as Manhattan building explodes
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014