- Megachurch pastor with ties to Obama commits suicide
- WaPo to readers: Send us your ‘gun violence’ stories for Sandy Hook anniversary
- U.S. threatens Ukraine with sanctions over dispatch of riot police
- Canada doing away with door-to-door mail delivery by 2018
- NSA chief defends phone spying: ‘There is no other way’
- Hawaii Health Department head killed in plane crash
- Colorado school drops sexual harassment label on boy who kissed girl’s hand
- Australia court strikes down 5-day-old, gay-marriage law
- Fake interpreter at Mandela service: ‘Sorry,’ I have schizophrenia
- George Zimmerman will not be charged in domestic dispute
EDITORIAL: Bye, Bye Byrd
Moments of grace from the king of pork
Question of the Day
It is customary to avoid speaking ill of the newly deceased, so perhaps the less admirable elements of the life and career of the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd are better left to be examined at a later date. The West Virginia Democrat died yesterday at age 92. Set aside, for now, his background as a leader of the Ku Klux Klan, his outrageous pork-barreling and his general liberal-blowhard tendencies. Instead, Americans today can respect Mr. Byrd’s devotion to Senate traditions, even when they ran contrary to his own political desires.
In the 1997 book “Integrity,” Yale Law School professor Stephen L. Carter related one of Mr. Byrd’s finest moments. In 1986, a year before the nomination of Judge Robert Bork, President Reagan proposed former Indiana state Sen. Daniel Manion for a seat on the federal appeals bench. This sparked an intense confirmation battle in the Senate. On the day of the vote, several of Mr. Manion’s supporters were away. As was the practice of the time, Democratic opponents agreed to “pair” with those supporters by withholding their own ballots, ensuring no alteration in the outcome from the absences. At the last minute, it appeared that Mr. Manion would be confirmed by one vote. Then-Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr., Delaware Democrat, reneged on his agreement to abstain and instead voted no.
Appalled by Mr. Biden’s duplicity, Mr. Byrd temporarily changed his vote to cancel the effect of his colleague’s switch - even though he opposed Mr. Manion’s confirmation. Mr. Byrd eventually engineered a fair re-balloting which Mr. Manion won by a single vote. Mr. Byrd chose the honorable path instead of an easy political victory. He realized that the harm done to the institution, and to the republic, would be greater if the process were damaged than from the loss on any one particular issue of the day.
As big a spender as he was, Mr. Byrd also zealously guarded the eponymous “Byrd Rule,” which attempted to apply a modicum of discipline to the budget. Though Americans rightly look askance at many other aspects of Mr. Byrd’s long career, they nonetheless should acknowledge his reverence for the institution itself. R.I.P.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: This is no bargain
- EDITORIAL: The new payday inequality
- EDITORIAL: Turbulence at 30,000 feet
- EDITORIAL: Harry Reid's favor factory
- EDITORIAL: Mr. Obama's pretentious obsession
Latest Blog Entries
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
Get Breaking Alerts
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- Washington Post to readers: Send us your gun violence stories for Sandy Hook anniversary
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- MALCOLM/REIMER: Over-criminalization undermines respect for legal system
- Study IDs reasons for late-term abortions
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Rand Paul: Budget deal 'shameful,' 'huge mistake'
- Colorado school drops sexual harassment label on boy who kissed girl's hand
- Teen thugs in D.C. run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets