- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
- ‘Duck Dynasty’ Phil Robertson suspended ‘indefinitely’ for gay quip
- John Podesta eats crow: ‘I apologize to Speaker Boehner’
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Fighting Kagan’s nomination is a fool’s errand
Question of the Day
I am disappointed to learn that some United States Senate Republicans are planning an active fight against the confirmation of associate justice of the Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan (“The case against Kagan,” editorials, June 25).
Although she has no judicial experience, it is clear that former Solicitor General Kagan is a highly intelligent, educated, articulate and experienced attorney. There is no reason to believe that she is an extremist nor that there is any legitimate reason to bar her from service.
One cannot state often enough that presidential elections have consequences. One of them is that the president generally has the ability to select judicial appointees of his choosing with the “advice and consent” of the Senate, not the slashing and burning of the nomination. The fact that President Obama is now justifiably unpopular and unlikely to be re-elected does not enter into the equation.
There is plenty of ammunition that the GOP may use against this president, most notably his unconscionable and unsustainable run-up of the national debt and entitlement expectations. Fighting the nomination of Ms. Kagan tooth and nail, however, can at this point be declared a fool’s errand.
If the GOP plans to forge ahead with a divisive, rancorous Supreme Court confirmation process, it does so at its own risk and peril, and shall surely be exposed as seeking political advantage at all costs.
Upper St. Clair, Pa.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
Get Breaking Alerts
- Border Patrol helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Half of America strips religion from Christmas
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- In court filing, NCAA denies legal duty to protect athletes
- La. Gov. Jindal defends suspended Duck Dynasty star