- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
- Senators: Cease-fire must allow Israel to defend against rockets, tunnels
- Sierra Leone doctor fighting Ebola catches disease
- Iraq welcomes Russian fighter jets, helicopter gunships into ISIL fight
- John McCain laments: Obama’s ‘self-pity … is really kind of sad’
- GOP offer to fix VA gives $10 billion in emergency funds
- Paul Ryan offers to repair U.S. economic safety net with a single grant stream
- Kim Jong-un builds bond with Putin: $250M Russia-backed addition to key port opens
- Pope Francis meets Meriam Ibrahim, a Sudanese woman sentenced to death
Kagan won’t criticize Roberts court
Question of the Day
Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan on Wednesday declined an invitation from Senate Democrats to portray the current high court as partisan, dismissing concerns that a spate of 5-4 decisions is eroding important legal precedents.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, Rhode Island Democrat, questioning Ms. Kagan during the third day of her confirmation hearing, asked if the conservative-leaning court lead by Chief Justice John G. Roberts should do more to fashion more moderate decisions that gain a greater majority on the court.
"If the court were to reach beyond the group of five that has driven so many of these recent decisions, they would be less able to move the law as dramatically as they have," Mr. Whitehouse said.
Ms. Kagan answered that she didn't agree with the senator's characterizations of the current court.
"I think that that would be inappropriate for me to do," Ms. Kagan told the Senate Judiciary Committee. "I'm sure that everybody up there is acting in good faith."
Ms. Kagan added that narrow decisions can benefit the court because they "enable consensus."
"And consensus is, in general, a very good thing for the judicial process and for the country," she said.
Republicans on the panel expressed some frustration with the nominee's refusal to offer more insights about her own opinions on a number of major issues. Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the committee's top Republican, accused her of not being forthcoming in her answers.
"Critics who are saying, 'Who is this nominee? Exactly what do you believe?' might find it from the testimony difficult to know if, Ms. Kagan, whether you'd be more like John Roberts or more like [liberal Justice] Ruth Bader Ginsburg?" he said.
Despite Mr. Sessions' concerns, Ms. Kagan, the Obama administration's solicitor general, appeared on track to earn confirmation from the Democratic-led Senate later this summer.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Sean Lengell covers Congress and national politics and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- GOP tests Democrats on college loan issue
- Lawmakers outside intelligence loop get miffed about briefing structure in Congress
- John Boehner: Time is right to bring latest farm bill to House floor
- Supreme Court nears rulings on key voting rights cases
- N.J. Gov. Christie picks state A.G. to fill U.S. Senate seat
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Michael Widlanski
Leveling the battlefield to aid terrorists enables evil to fight on
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Evidence shows Russia firing artillery into Ukraine: Pentagon
- Norway expects imminent 'concrete threat' from ISIL terrorists 'within days'
- Tom Petty: 'No one's got Christ more wrong than the Christians'
- Cutler wins endorsement from gun control group
- Eugenie Bouchard pulls out of D.C.'s Citi Open
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq