- Algerian airplane goes missing over Mali: ‘Emergency plan’ launched
- Colorado judge strikes voter-backed gay marriage ban, but issues stay
- Brooklyn Bridge flag-swapping suspects identified by nickname
- Christian woman in Sudan spared for apostasy flies to Italy
- Iraq: 60 dead in attack on prisoner convoy
- Marco Rubio: U.S. at social, moral crossroads
- ‘We’re coming for you, Barack Obama’: Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL
- White flags baffle NYPD: ‘We’re lucky it wasn’t a bomb’
- N.Y. Gov. Cuomo’s office interfered with, pressured corruption commission: report
- Brit lawmaker: I would fire on Israel if I lived in Gaza
Strategists: GOP is peaking too early
Question of the Day
Former President Bill Clinton’s top political strategists, who had a front-row seat for the Republicans’ 1994 electoral successes, said Wednesday that the GOP today is peaking too early and is unlikely to see a repeat performance this November.
Pollster Stan Greenberg said a “change election,” as political scientists call major shifts in electoral preferences, already happened when Republican Scott Brown’s surprise victory for Sen. Edward M. Kennedy’s Senate seat, and between then and November, Democrats will have gained back ground.
“When we look back on this, we’re going to say Massachusetts is when 1994 happened,” Mr. Greenberg said.
He said Democrats still will lose seats in Congress, and if the election were to take place today, it would be a “change election” that would devastate Democrats. But he said that with seven months until Election Day, Republicans will falter and Democrats will improve slightly.
“It’s still going to be a tough election, and it’ll be marginally better than it is now, but I don’t think we’re 1994,” he said.
They both said a major difference between 1994 and this year is that in the earlier campaign Republicans emerged from every policy fight with a strengthened brand image. This year, Mr. Greenberg said, both parties are less popular than they were in 1994 and Republicans in particular are suffering from each policy fight.
Mr. Carville predicted Republicans will net about 25 House seats and six or seven Senate seats — not enough to give them control of either chamber, but enough to drop Democrats’ margins dramatically.
He said, though, that this will be the third election in a row where a party has scored those big congressional wins, following Democrats’ double-dip successes of 2006 and 2008, and said voters are profoundly unhappy.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- Lois Lerner emails reveal gaping open-records loophole
- Two-thirds of illegal immigrant children approved for asylum: report
- Top Justice official denies conspiring with IRS on tea party targeting
- Boehner: No bill on border surge
- Taking Obama to court a long shot but lawsuit not folly, Congress is told
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- EDITORIAL: Poor Hillary, rock-star wannabe
- Netanyahu's Wikipedia page replaced with giant Palestinian flag
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Hezbollah in Syria could join fight against Israel
- Hamas orders civilians to die in Israeli airstrikes
- Democratic Sen. John Walsh plagiarized War College master's thesis: report
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- FIELDS: A tale of a boy, a Bible and a gun
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq