- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
GOP argues against hasty vote on Russia arms treaty
Senate Republicans are calling for a deliberate review of the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) before a formal vote on ratification of the U.S.-Russian agreement.
“There is no need for the Senate to rush one of its most solemn constitutional duties in deciding whether to give its consent to an arms control treaty,” a Republican Policy Committee report said.
“This treaty raises many questions striking at the heart of U.S. national security,” said the report, a reflection of Senate Republican leadership views. “The Senate must be given appropriate time to work through these questions.”
Sen. John Thune, South Dakota Republican and chairman of the policy committee, said in an interview that the Senate’s Democratic leaders have not stated a timetable for a ratification vote.
White House officials have said they hope to win ratification before the end of the year. Some Republicans say that would put a vote on the treaty before November and give Democrats a political tool for what are expected to be contentious elections.
A Senate Foreign Relations Committee spokeswoman had no immediate comment on a ratification schedule. Senate Democratic aides have said the committee hopes to have a vote by the August recess, with a full Senate vote as early as the fall.
Mr. Thune made clear that there will be no rush for a vote. “Any suggestion that this should be rushed would be ill-founded,” he said. “The bottom line is that the Senate needs to be given appropriate time to complete its work.”
Mr. Thune said the treaty raises issues that must be addressed before it is ratified, including a lack of specificity in the Obama administration’s plan under the 2010 defense authorization to fund and authorize a modernization program for the U.S. nuclear arsenal.
Additionally, Republicans want answers about the START impact on missile defenses, treaty verification and tactical nuclear weapons.
Mr. Thune dismissed anticipated charges by Democrats that Republicans will try to obstruct ratification. “We take very seriously the constitutional duty that we have to evaluate the merits of a treaty like this independently,” he said.
Meanwhile, in the first hearing on the issue Tuesday, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in support of ratification.
Mr. Gates defended the treaty from statements by Russian government officials who have said Moscow will withdraw from the pact if the Pentagon moves ahead with more missile defenses.
Russian objections to U.S. missile defenses go back decades, Mr. Gates said. “The Russians have hated missile defense ever since the strategic arms talks began in 1969,” he said. “It’s the latest chapter in a long line of Russian objections to our proceeding with missile defense and, frankly, I think it’s because … we can afford it and they can’t.”
Mr. Gates said the U.S. is continuing deployments of missile defenses and will not be constrained by the treaty.
He said of Moscow’s treaty withdrawal threat that “the Russians can say what they want” but their unilateral statements are not codified in the treaty and thus “have no standing.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Bill Gertz is a national security columnist for The Washington Times and senior editor at The Washington Free Beacon (www.freebeacon.com). He has been with The Times since 1985.
He is the author of six books, four of them national best-sellers. His latest book, “The Failure Factory,” on government bureaucracy and national security, was published in September 2008.
- Inside the Ring: Pentagon reevaluating Obama's pivot to Asia
- Inside the Ring: All eyes on Moscow's military moves in Ukraine
- Inside the Ring: China readies for 'short, sharp' war with Japan
- Inside the Ring: U.S., China in war of words over South China Sea air zone
- Inside the Ring: China military on the rails
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- Senate Democrats, Republicans spar over restoring unemployment benefits
- 80 people publicly executed across North Korea for films, Bibles
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- CURL: The modern GOP really is Reagan's 'Big Tent' party
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Six Senate seats could hinge on Keystone pipeline
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
- CPAC 2014: Straw poll signals Paul-Cruz showdown
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again