- Associated Press - Wednesday, November 10, 2010

JUNEAU, Alaska | Alaska election officials began counting more than 92,500 write-in ballots Wednesday in a Senate race that may hinge on voters’ penmanship and their ability or lack of to spell “Murkowski” on their write-in ballots.

Murkowsi. Murkowsky. Even, possibly, Muckowski. All were variations of Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s name noted by ballot counters and immediately challenged by observers for Joe Miller, her GOP rival in the still-unsettled Nov. 2 race.

Mrs. Murkowski ran as a write-in candidate after losing Alaska’s GOP primary to Mr. Miller, a “tea party” favorite, in August. In the Nov. 2 election, voters cast several thousand more ballots for write-in candidates than they did for Mr. Miller, and it’s those ballots that are now in question in the count, which election officials hope to finish by Friday.

An early tally of 7,638 ballots Wednesday showed Mrs. Murkowski winning 89 percent of the write-in vote without dispute and another 8.9 percent of ballots were counted for her but contested. There was one write-in vote for “Joe Miller.”

The laborious tallying process bore some resemblance to the 2000 Florida presidential recount, though a decade later, it was misspellings and bad penmanship not hanging chads that took center stage in Juneau.

Alaska Elections Division Director Gail Fenumiai (right) and state Assistant Attorney General Sarah Felix examine a ballot Wednesday in Juneau. Republican nominee Joe Miller sued Tuesday to prevent the state from using discretion in determining voter intent on write-in ballots. (Associated Press)
Alaska Elections Division Director Gail Fenumiai (right) and state Assistant Attorney General ... more >

The process played out in a cavernous building on the outskirts of the city, with the two candidates’ attorneys and observers carefully watching it unfold.

Observers for Mr. Miller whose vote total trailed the number of write-in ballots cast in the Nov. 2 election by 11,333 as of Tuesday were quick to challenge virtually any ballot on which Mrs. Murkowski’s scribbled-in name was misspelled or letters were difficult to decipher.

While the scene that unfolded Wednesday had all the makings of the Florida recount, it had none of the circuslike atmosphere. Election workers and observers went about their work studiously as it was aired for a statewide audience, with the noise barely raising above a din at times.

“This is Juneau, Alaska. This isn’t Caracas [Venezuela],” said John Tiemessen, a Miller attorney. “I would’ve been shocked if there would’ve been anything interesting” broadcast from this.

Workers and observers came across a range of ballots, with plenty of variations on Murkowski’s last name; common misspellings were “Merkowski,” or “Murcowski.” There even were some Lizas.

“Oh, misspelled. They forgot the ‘k,”’ one worker said as she put the ballot in box No. 4, which was reserved for variations or misspellings of Mrs. Murkowski’s name that needed a ruling from the director of the Division of Elections, Gail Fenumiai. The final decision rests with Ms. Fenumiai.

Ms. Fenumiai was generous in crediting misspellings to Mrs. Murkowski’s tally, drawing objections from Miller observers. She said if the name written was phonetically similar to Murkowski‘s, it would count.

Murkowski spokesman John Tracy suggested some of the challenges were frivolous.

“This isn’t supposed to be a penmanship test,” he said.

The count began as planned in spite of a lawsuit filed Tuesday by Mr. Miller, seeking to prevent the state from using discretion in determining voter intent on ballots. Mr. Miller’s attorney, Thomas Van Flein, said he wants to ensure a fair count.

Story Continues →