- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
Study suggests mammograms under 50 if family risk
Question of the Day
LONDON (AP) - Women in their 40s with a moderately high family risk of breast cancer should get yearly mammograms, a new British study suggests.
Though such testing is standard in the U.S. for that age group with a family history, women in Europe who have an intermediate family risk are not always offered screening if they are under 50.
British researchers followed 6,710 women under 50 who had a moderate breast cancer risk _ meaning women who meet criteria such as having one close female relative who had breast cancer in her 40s or younger. Such woman have double to triple the risk of having breast cancer as the average woman.
The women were monitored for about five years and given a yearly mammogram for about four years. A total of 136 women from the group were diagnosed with breast cancer during the course of the study.
Doctors thought it would be unethical to have a comparison group that was not offered screening. So they used two previous studies: of women who were not screened and of breast cancer patients with a family history.
The study was too short to show whether the screening saved lives, but using tumor size and severity, Duffy and colleagues estimated annual mammograms reduced the death rate by 20 percent in women with a moderate family breast cancer risk.
The tumors they found were also smaller and less likely to have spread when compared to women who hadn’t been screened and later had cancer. The scientists calculated two women would be saved for every 1,000 women screened over a decade.
The research was published online Thursday in the medical journal Lancet Oncology. It was paid for by the U.K. National Health Service Technology Assessment.
In Britain and elsewhere in Europe, women can get mammograms every two years from age 50 to 70 unless they have a high risk of breast cancer, in which case they may be tested earlier.
“At the moment, whether or not women with a moderate family risk get tested varies considerably,” said Stephen Duffy, professor of cancer screening at Queen Mary University of London and one of the study authors.
“We hope our findings will push governments to make this kind of mammography universal for these women.”
Policies and opinions vary on whether women at average risk should be screened before 50. A U.S. health task force last year concluded that women at average risk for breast cancer don’t need mammograms in their 40s but not all groups agreed with that decision.
“All women over 40, both those at normal risk and intermediate and high risk, should be getting mammograms on a regular basis,” said Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society. He was not linked to the study.
Karsten Jorgensen of the Nordic Cochrane Centre in Copenhagen said doctors are overtreating breast cancer and many women who are screened will test positive for a cancer that would never have threatened their health.
“Any woman needs to consider the harms and benefits carefully before she decides if she wants to be screened,” he said.
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Democrats cite pope in call for minimum wage hike, jobless benefits
- In court filing, NCAA denies legal duty to protect athletes
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- Outrage over Phil Robertson suspension, 'malignant' political correctness
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Dolloff and friends.
Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. and beyond.
In a world that is increasingly complex, we need to seek greater awareness of the blending of cultures and America's changing role in a global community.
Find up-to-date information on the D.C. and Baltimore live music scenes and read interviews with artists and reviews of the latest releases and concerts.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow