- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
- John Boehner says GOP should support gay candidates: ‘I do’
- Grass-Whopper: Pan-fried cricket burgers go over big in New York City
- CDC sees measles spike and ‘failure to vaccinate’
Voters decide against legal pot
Others limit tax increases
California voters decided not to legalize pot, but voters in other ballot initiatives across the country made clear Tuesday their distaste for tax hikes, voting to limit how their states can raise revenue and changing how some budget decisions are made.
California’s closely watched Proposition 19 would have made it the first state to legalize marijuana for recreational use. But it was losing by nearly 10 percentage points with the final votes being tallied Wednesday, amid warnings from GOPGov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and top officials of both parties that it could bring legal chaos. If it had been approved, adults could possess up to an ounce of pot and consume it in nonpublic places.
Tim Rosales, who managed the “No on 19” campaign, said the initiative lost despite the fact that liberal candidates did relatively well in California’s midterm elections.
“This is a state that just bucked the national trend and went pretty hard on the Democratic side, but yet in the same vote opposed Prop 19,” Mr. Rosales told the Associated Press. “I think that says volumes as far as where California voters are on this issue.”
According to the Brookings Institution, there were nearly 100 statewide and 450 local tax measures on Tuesday’s ballots.
Economic issues dominated in other state ballot questions, and despite the tight-fisted mood, voters still worked to preserve education funding, approving billions of dollars in public debt for schools.
“I’m not surprised by that given the political period we’re in,” said Scott Pattison, executive director of the National Association of State Budget Officers. He added that voters were affected by a rough economy and low trust of government.
“We’re still in a very scarce resource environment for states, so they’re going to have make tough choices,” he said, referring to how states will handle limits on tax hikes. “They’ve already done a lot of cutting. Will they continue to cut?”
The longest economic recession since the end of World War II has left states scrambling to balance their budgets. All states except Vermont must finish their fiscal years with balanced budgets, and for two years legislators have been slashing spending and raising taxes to wipe out deficits.
Most notably Tuesday, a measure establishing an income tax in the state of Washington failed. The initiative would have levied the tax on individuals making more than $200,000 a year and couples earning more than $400,000 a year.
Washington voters then went a step further - tax increases now require a two-thirds “supermajority” vote in the legislature or a statewide ballot.
Voters in Montana barred new taxation on property transfers or sales, while Massachusetts voters repealed the state sales tax on alcohol. Indiana cemented its statutory property tax cap in the state constitution, and Missouri added limits to property taxes and city income taxes to the constitution.
Some limits on taxes, though, did not win over voters.
A trio of proposed constitutional amendments in Colorado that would have radically limited how the state could tax and borrow failed. Dubbed “Armageddon on Colorado Ballots” by the Denver Post’s editorial page, the measures would have cut the state income-tax rate, banned future state borrowing, required voter approval for local government borrowing and cut or reduced other taxes.
Massachusetts voters also rejected a drastic tax cut, voting down a measure to reduce the state sales tax to 3 percent from 6.25 percent, which would have cost the state $2.5 billion.
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality
- New battlefront emerges in war between Republicans, tea party
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Obama administration issues permits for wind farms to kill more eagles
- Budget negotiators look to federal workers for benefit concessions
- Obama downplays IRS scandal, blames Obamacare rollout on 'outdated' agencies
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
A politically conservative and morally liberal Hebrew alpha male hunts left-wing viper
This column will cover anything that has anything remotely to do with the game of baseball, from the game itself to mid-summer trades to offseason moves.
Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. and beyond.
Political satirist and Christian apologist Bob Siegel discusses religion and politics.
White House pets gone wild!