Fenty seeks cuts in jobs, services to fix budget gap

Others look to taxes, fees

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

Mayor Adrian M. Fenty has proposed his plan to right-size an unbalanced budget, which the public scrutinized Tuesday during a D.C. Council hearing at which several lawmakers and stakeholders proposed a host of new taxes and fees.

Mr. Fenty’s plan to close a $188 million budget gap for 2010 slashes agency budgets - including police, schools and social services - by $161 million. But with lawmakers, unlike the lame-duck mayor, still facing a potential $375 million deficit for 2011 when budget deliberations begin anew in the spring, city leaders are weighing raising current taxes and imposing new ones to push back spending pressures.

They also want to work around a federal law that prohibits the city from levying property taxes on federally owned land and on such federally protected entities as Fannie Mae and the Daughters of the American Revolution.

“We need to start to be more creative about making folks pay a fair share,” said Democrat Mary Cheh of Ward 3. “They should pay something in lieu of taxes.”

Union Station was cited an example. The rail station is exempt from property taxes because it is situated on federal land, but lobbyist David Wilmot urged the council to pass legislation that would tax Union Station businesses.

A new land-use levy imposed on the businesses could “generate about $10 million to $11 million this budget year,” Mr. Wilmot testified, urging lawmakers to move quickly “with Republicans coming into [Capitol] Hill.”

While the District is bound by law to sustain a balanced budget, city officials also are moving with a sense of urgency because the Republicans who won a House majority last month already have vowed stricter oversight of D.C. affairs.

Some D.C. leaders revealed their tax-raising strategy on Tuesday.

“There are taxes other than income we can consider,” said Democrat Jim Graham of Ward 1, who also plans to reintroduce legislation that would raise income taxes on wealthy residents. “The Off-Street Vehicle Storage and Use Tax principally involves downtown garages. It is 12 percent and has not changed since 1976 and is principally paid by commuters. Raising the rate to 18 percent would produce $19 million annually.”

Mr. Graham and Michael A. Brown resurrected their arguments to raise taxes on the wealthy.

Council member David A. Catania, at-large independent, said he and his colleagues shouldn’t engage in “class-warfare finger-pointing” and proposed “modest, broad-based” tax increases.

Not all stakeholders agreed with the lawmakers’ tax-and-spend direction.

The council “should institute an across-the-board spending cut,” said Robert Brannum, president of the D.C. Federation of Civic Associations.

“Folks at the top of the income bracket have their attackers, and folks at the bottom have their defenders, but folks in the middle are fighting for survival,” said Mr. Brannum as people scheduled to testify streamed in and out of the council chamber.

The witness list included more than 160 stakeholders eager to testify on the mayor’s plan, which also proposes eliminating 250 jobs.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

About the Author
Deborah Simmons

Deborah Simmons

Award-winning opinion writer Deborah Simmons is a senior correspondent who reports on City Hall and writes about education, culture, sports and family-related topics. Mrs. Simmons has worked at several newspapers, and since joining The Washington Times in 1985, has served as editorial-page editor and features editor and on the metro desk. She has taught copy editing at the University of ...

Latest Stories

Latest Blog Entries

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks